president trump needs people he can count on in the senate. he needs mo brooks. someone who has worked harder than anyone else in congress. a proven conservative, brooks will never compromise on election integrity. there s liz cheney trashing trump again. why didn t she say that when she was running before just like katie brit? she might not say it but she s a lobbyist. it s been interesting. nancy pelosi used to be name that republicans would use to sometimes attack other republicans if they were there. now it s liz cheney. just moments ago, trump endorsed another primary challenger taking on a house member who impreached him. he backed russell frey against south carolina congressman tom rice. up next, new developments on the crisis in ukraine. as russian president vladimir putin says his security demands were, quote, ignored by the west. but he still has not responded
faith argument from some conservative this is nominee, whoever she is, will be picked mainly on her race and her gender and less so on her qualifications. they don t want to even give the appearance of that being true. part of the reason they might settle on a slower, more deliberate process is to make it clear to the american people this is a measured, a well informed, well choreographed process. it won t take two to three months most likely and it won t take 30 days. there will be something in the middle of that. if they re trying to push this from a 50/50 vote with vice president harris being the tiebreaker and maybe pick up two or three republicans, a longer process helps them do that. senator collins voted against justice barrett, not based on her qualifications but she didn t like how quickly the process moved. a slower process might also bring along some other republicans.