issue, only this time her answer was different. she said that she had been asked the question a million times and the answer, quote, remains the same. but, in fact, the first time, instead of saying the president had never spoken to hunter about his business dealings, she said this. the president was never in business with his son. so on wednesday, phil wegman from real clear politics pointed out the inconsistency, but john pierr pierre insisted it was the same. i just want to clear this up once for all. the president has said he s never discussed overseas business dealings with his son, but the white house now says that the president has never been in business with his son. so why the updated language? which statement is true? or is it semantics and they are both true? as i stated on monday, when i was asked this question multiple times, nothing has changed. nothing has changed. nothing has changed on this. and so you can ask me a million different ways on this quest
Has to offer. we re collaborating with uc berkeley, the booker corporation and hopefully within a month we ll know the composition and we can tell if this material is different than the one we have in the solar system and whether it s technological in origin. we can easily see the mortar droplets from computer screens, from stainless steel. just think of it as voyager colliding with another planet and burning up as a meteor. doctor, a social media reaction. i m going to put it on the screen and i ll read it aloud in case i need your expertise to weigh in. if they did have alien craft, why would they hide it? go ahead and take a second crack at that. i ve already raised the issue. well, only for commercial reasons or for having some advantage over adversaries. that could be imagined. but as we all know, even the