Robbery thats burglary, ill get it right. And in this situation youve got somebody really caught in the middle of it, and that doesnt excuse the person from the consequences. Professors, weve talked about abuse of power and bribery. When we started we said we would also discuss obstruction of congress. So i would like to ask you some questions about obstruction of congress. Professor gerhardt, in your view, is there enough evidence here to charge President Trump with the high crime and misdemeanor of obstruction of congress . I think theres more than enough. As i mentioned in my statement, just to really underscore this, the third article of impeachment approved by the House Judiciary Committee against president nixon charged him with misconduct because he had failed to comply with four legislative subpoenas. Here it is far more than four
that this president has failed to comply with. And he has ordered the Executive Branch as well not to cooperate with congress. Those together with a
adam schiff deranged and a maniac, insulting nancy pelosi, and saying that nothing has been presented, the fact is the president has had this very disruptive meeting where he was put off by emmanuel macron s comments even before the nato meeting, got into an argument with him, blasted macron, they went back and forth. there were the open mic moments where we can t absolutely prove were the other leaders talking about the president but from my reporting in the past at the g20 in osaka, there were similar moments where they were gathered and we saw pictures and in fact they were talking about the president who has usually been prompt to things at the white house but seems to be coming to these grand summits always late and maybe showing his dominance of the events by keeping everyone waiting. but also, this impeachment hearing. the fascinating testimony to my mind, to hear these law professors, professor feldman