people with full anonymity and confidentiality and privacy protection. there are often gaps in terms of what i would call key management, how you identify the remote parties that you re communicating with. i think the communities you work with are right to be concerned with, that what they re getting doesn t live up to the security they need. there are tools out there that are a significant up from where they had been. she mentioned you know, three years ag ç there was traffic was a small fraction of what was going on, on the internet. now if you look at all web traffic, it s significantly larger than it used to be. many people who run websites had decided we need to be doing this. this should be the new standard. why were we sending unencrypted communication across the internet in the first place? so this doesn t get all the way to the end-to-end encryption, but it is a step up and it does protect users against certain attacks. there are still failures. i don t know if an
date. i think one of the many frustrations about the actions that russia chose to take in ukraine is that we have built, over some years better cooperation with rush sha on a number of fronts that were obviously beneficial to our own security and interest. and security and beneficial to theirs. whether it was new start whether it was iran, whether it was afghanistan where rush sha cooperation has been important in allowing us to move people and material in and out. but the bolt tom line is where it advances that self interest. it continues. so how do you assess putin s intentions towards the three baltic states? is nato absolutely committed to defending them? and does nato have the military capability to do so whether it would be a conventional kind of aggression or, as we ve seen them do in c rrksz imea and in the eastern provinces of ukraine, this sort of new, ser up tishsz ukraine. the answer is yes. period. with regard to the third part of the question do we have the
good afternoon, everybody. welcome to the washington stut for our lecture series. i am very, very pleased to have the pleasure of hosting this event on rehabilitation and reintegration of return inging foreign terrorist fighters. we have here in 2 room today several foreign delegations official government delegations civil society delegations. not everyone is someone who is going do be rehabilitated. not guilty everybody is going to be someone who can be reeffect ily integrated in a society in a particular easy way. so fsz not soft or weak as a counter radicalization as a cve tool to be talking, also, about how to reha bill tat and reintegrate people iert once they k078 e come out of prison. certainly once they are in prison. yesterday s serving as universities for terrorism is r as one official put it. but also those returning now else specially from syria and iraq. i was talking to someone the other day and they said why not just not let these people back
credit with our palestinian partners, to do it. in jordan, we worked on their education system. we ve done that 10 years ago. currently we re working on the refugee capability, health care and education. we know how to transform. so the business or government leader, if somebody can bring you huge benefits that you want, as a track record of being trusted this is an issue for merkel to solve with a bomb. they ve got to have rules of the road in conduct. they ve got to resolve it there. you can t put your businesses in between. it s a fitting note here on u.n. week. just a few last things. speaking of heads of state hillary clinton, she came to address your sales meeting at tell us what happened. what was it like? does she have it? is she going to get it? well, it was interesting. i ve had the honor to interview probably 20 heads of states. i ve interviewed her husband probably four times. she didn t want to know the questions ahead of time she gave a good opening commen
rn. she is 38 years old. her interest rate is 8.5% interest from the government. why is the interest rate so high on these student loans? guest: it is not high relative to what they would be paying from a private lender. it is a subsidized rate. there is a new innovation in the student loan market when they with private lenders. host: linda, what is your situation? caller: my husband has student loans. there are so many things being said that are not true. we started out with $31,000 in student loan debt after having them since 2000, we are down to $54,000. we have been making a $340 payment for the last four years and only seen our balance go up. we are on the income or tengion payment plan. to say this we are on the income retention payment plan. we are battling with a student loan provider where it says in the contingent plan, it is capped at 10% of the original loan value. they had added an added and keep trying to say that is the way it goes. after 25 years, you say