document comes out, it will change everything that we know about the search of mar-a-lago. now, there are three relevant documents here, the first two, the search warrant and the property received, those are out in the public. we ve seen those. just for the sake of comparison, the search warrant that is three pages. it s mostly a form you fill out it tells us where the fbi wanted to search and the criminal laws the doj is looking at. it the property seized. that s also three pages. most of those entries just say box of documents. but the affidavit, the affidavit is a game-changer. this is a narrative document that the prosecutor has to write out. i have written more of these than i can even count. they re dozens of pages wouldn t at all surprise me if this were 50 to 100 pages. they list probable cause, you have to list specific evidence. you bring it over to the judge. we know the judge in this case reviewed and approved it. just to make an analogy to prove it. back when w
that only plays in the hands of an authoritarian regime that then uses that in their propaganda because they want to be seen as the same level and they often, the chinese are famous for lecturing us at these types of meetings. where is the big deliverable. where is the big thing? is it on trade? is it on them stealing our i.d.? the threatening of taiwan? north korea which is about to test another nuke, their military build up in south china sea. what s the big deliverable here? i don t see one. i don t see why we are having this meeting. you talk about what s the big thing taiwan fair trade, north korea. the military build up and the first thing joe biden brought up in the opening comments was about climate change and climate control. but, i do want to get to this. that kind of leads into this about biden kind of flip-flopping back and forth on what he thinks about china. let s listen to this and talk about it on the other side. i want china to succeed.
states can manage our differences prevent competition from becoming anything conflict. world has come to a crossroads. the world expects that china and the united states will properly handle the relationship. carley: former congressman michael waltz and green roads commander. what s at stake when it documents this meeting and how should the president play it. these meetings between heads of state, particularly between the world s largest and second largest economy should be very big deal. there should have been a series of smaller meetings between foreign ministers and their deputies that lead up to some time of big deliverable. a nuclear arms reduction treaty. a trade agreement. i don t understand why we re having this meeting. because, if biden is just going to kind of yuck it up.
investment in climate change that the federal government has made. secondly, prescription drug prices are a vital kitchen table concern for millions and millions of americans, especially people on medicare. and the fact that insulin for diabetics on medicare is going to be happened at $35, at co-pay. and the fact that the negotiating drug price negotiation is coming, not immediately, but it s coming. that s going to be very popular. and so will, to some degree, in a campaign setting, the notion that democrats are taxing big corporations that haven t been paying their taxes. all of that provides some campaign ammunition for democrats, at a time when many, many, political environmental conditions are negative for them as they always are in the first midterm for a new president. yeah, that drug negotiation, big deliverable. but you know what, we re talking 2026, to 2029. right. you re trying to sell people. everyone loves immediate
american public and making sure they can have a clear picture of who tested whom, who called whom, what was said and when, and said by whom, is critical. because that s what they want to be in the fronts of voters minds. i also point out that the other big deliverable from that focus group was we want accountability and we want to make sure this never happens again. and so they are looking for that tangible referral whether for criminal charges to the doj or otherwise. and what would be more tangible and concrete than referring a former president in trump to the doj for some criminal prosecution? that is what people want to see happen because they recognize if nothing happens, if no one is held accountable, this absolutely could happen again and we will likely not be able to survive as a democracy. susan, robert riesh published a klum today on the true meaning of january 6. this is part of what he wrote. the republican party is close to becoming a cult whose central