harvard s laurence tribe and the retired conservative federal judge jay michael luttig, declared that the constitution prohibits trump from ever being president again, based on section three of the 14th amendment. since then, there s been movement in court in multiple states where efforts have sprung up to enforce the 14th amendment. one case, seeking to disqualify trump was dismissed by the minnesota supreme court, but that case was specific to trump being on the primary election ballot for the republican nomination, so the argument could be brought before the court again for the general election ballot. in another case in michigan, a judge ruled that it was a non-justice-able political issue, that should be decided by congress, not by the state. just yesterday, the petitioners appeal that ruling to the michigan supreme court. but this ruling out of colorado is particularly interesting, because the opinion goes further that any of the other judges have been willing to vent
Authority in england, and you will remember when keir starmer took over as labour leader, he made a winning back the support of the jewish population one of his key priorities. but i suppose there is just that big a question that keir starmer will be mulling over as he jumps on a change to his next visit, which is, what does the whole picture tell us about where labour support is based now? because the vote in london is clearly stronger than perhaps it has ever been, may be some of the old jokes about scotland where you wade labour s votes might become true of london, but he will be keeping an eye over the next few hours in places like the next few hours in places like the north of england, the red wall. in scotland, where scottish labour scottish labour are confident of coming ahead of the conservatives, and in wales, where labour probably