it begins in just under one month. prosecutors in manhattan have asked new york judge juan merchant to impose a gag order on donald trump. sound familiar? barring him from attacking witnesses and exposing the identity of jurors or commenting on the prosecutors working on the case. prosecutors other than district attorney alvin brag himself. in a filing submitted this afternoon, prosecutors write this, quote, the defendant has a long history and continuing pattern of public statements that attack judges, jurors, lawyers, witnesses, and other individuals involved in the legal proceedings against him. the filings are hundreds of pages long, they list a litany of threats made by donald trump and then what happens. the reaction to them. they lay out the call and response pattern, between an ex president who faced 91 felony counts across four jurisdictions and his most violent and extreme and motivated backers. prosecutors say that trumps attack have had direct and serious conseque
from european countries or nato. spain, italy, poland and the czech republic, issued similar statements. this afternoon, after howls of protest from the oppposition the french foreign minister stephane sejoure was forced to clarify mr macron s comments, that troops could be sent to ukraine for specific duties, without a combat role. translation: we need to consider new action to support ukraine. - these must meet very specific needs. i m thinking in particular of mine clearance, cyber, and the production of weapons on ukrainian territory. some of these actions, and i am answering the members question, some of these actions could require a presence on ukrainian territory without crossing the threshold of belligerence. nothing can be ruled out. this was, and still is, the position of the president of the republic. more generally there is frustration that while the french president was talking tough yesterday, the figures here, supplied by the kiel institute, suggest that franc
colleague and partner in crime here. office mate of sorts. sandra: great to send the morning with you. we spend a lot of time together sharing that wall up there. sandra smith, good to be with you as the former president deals with his growing legal troubles while campaigning for the white house. the crowded field for of republican challengers are working to respond to the latest headline involving the frontrunner as they chart their own course to the white house. bill: aishah hosni is looking at that. president trump s town hall. big showing in iowa. good morning to you, aishah. the former president says the whole thing really bothers him. democrats are trying to prevent him from returning to the white house. it is election interference. never been done like this in the history of our country. what is happening to our country, whether the borders, elections, or things like this where the d.o.j. has become a weapon for the democrats, an absolute weapon. trump got
and the worst in us, and television has been that. they don t pay me enough to deal with animals like this. people are no longer embarrassed to admit they watch television. we have seen the news and it is us. clark: slowly but surely, the 1970s are disappearing. the 1980s will be upon us. what a decade it is coming up. happy new year! [ cheers and applause ] auletta: as you begin the 80s in the television world, the landscape was, on any given evening, 9 out of 10 people were watching only one of three networks. more than 30 million people are addicted to it. social critics are mystified by its success. what is it? it s television s prime-time, prairie pot boiler, dallas. bobby: a move like that will destroy all of ewing oil, and it ll ruin our family name. i assure you, a thought like that never crossed my mind. brother or no brother, whatever it takes, i ll stop you from destroying ewing oil. dallas really did establish new ground in terms of the weekly, one hour sho
authority government in place, you have to give the palestinian people a political horizon to a better future and a two state solution. crucially you have to release all of the hostages and do that very quickly. she asked whether we challenge the israel government over individual episodes, yes, we do, i have done that personally with them ever and building that was bombed that had uk medics and other charities and will continue to do that as part of very important process we go through to judge whether they are in compliance with humanitarian law. is whether they are in compliance with humanitarian law. humanitarian law. is the minister aware of any humanitarian law. is the minister aware of any moves humanitarian law. is the minister aware of any moves by humanitarian law. is the minister aware of any moves by hamas i humanitarian law. is the minister aware of any moves by hamas to j aware of any moves by hamas to protect the children of gaza? currency is by releasing