first reported as claims that racial slurs against muslims could be heard inside the bus. in other words the jewish passengers on the bus had responded to the abuse against them by abusing the people outside in return and that is vehemently denied by those involved. the main dispute seems to be about whether there was a slur in english or whether in fact it was a call for help in hebrew that was misheard or mistranslated. so the executive complaints unit were asked to investigate whether the bc was justified were asked to investigate whether the bc wasjustified in including that detail about the racial slur as well as whether the bbc coverage had lacked impartiality and had effectively victim shamed the jewish passengers by implying they bore some or possibly for what happened. and what then has been found? the executive and what then has been found? tie: executive complaints unit does not accept the coverage lacked impartiality with the chart is a victim when we were born to but i do
of a racial slur in good faith, and they say the analysis of the video suggest it could have been said, but there was doubt so in words that they could have been saying something completely different in hebrew and the bbc should have reflected that out at an earlier stage in the coverage. so they upheld partially the complaint against the bc. bud upheld partially the complaint against the bc. upheld partially the complaint against the bc. and what kind of resonse against the bc. and what kind of response has against the bc. and what kind of response has there against the bc. and what kind of response has there been - against the bc. and what kind of response has there been tonightj against the bc. and what kind of - response has there been tonight was met the board of deputies certainly are not happy and they said they are dismayed. ibibfc are not happy and they said they are disma ed. .., are not happy and they said they are disma ed. , ., are not happy and they said they