Filing that he had prior to that admitted would be inaccurate. so, a judge can hold a contempt hearing. this is not a case justifying a racketeering indictment. if there is if he was inaccurate, that could be taken up in a contempt hearing, it can be taken up in a bar proceeding. but this is a gigantic rico thing, which is trying to put on eastman s lap everything done by everybody else. and i m not saying everybody else committed a crime. i m agnostic on that question. i m only interested in eastman. you re a lawyer. do you knowingly make false statements in court on behalf of your clients? because this will be up to the court to determine how significant those statements were and what the charges would be for that.