is a different threshold for them to do so. mark meadows was the former chief of staff to the former president at the time of january 6. just like steve bannon was not a member of the administration at the time. so there could be a little bit more of an executive privilege claim there. just a little bit. again, a great question for pete. but, i will say, the fact that last night in this house vote only two republicans voted to hold meadows in this criminal contempt referral compared to nine republicans who did so with steve bannon. well i asked one of those republicans who switched their vote from bannon to meadows, representative fred upton of michigan why he and his colleagues didn t vote for meadows and he didn t say it was because of the this claim of executive privilege. he said he thought that the committee rushed it a little bit. he wanted to wait and others wanted to wait a few more weeks to see if meadows would continue to comply. so they thought it moved a little bit too quic