Eight muslim-rich countries. where is the outrage? the ban targets machines not men but they are carried by people. yet, no outcry. politically we can t stop terrorists, only their gadgets. but at some point the bombs inside the gadgets will exceed our ability to detect them. nano weapons will soon be bigger threats than the conventional stuff. good luck tracking those. the device ban reveals an obvious truth. the threat comes from radical muslims and therefore more likely to come from muslim-rich countries. is it bigoted to say that? no, it s what scientists call a duh . not about religion, but ends. the truly dangerous have twisted the doctrine to their evil end. if you re looking for evil
Over the ban, and outside, mr. trump s florida estate where mr. trump is spending the weekend. reporter: it s up to the 9th circuit court and it denied the administration s request to immediately reinstate the travel ban. in the meantime the state department says those with valid advisas from the 7 countries this ban targets may enter the united states. u.s. district judge jim robart suspended the travel ban friday. he wrote in that ruling that those challenging the ban would likely succeed and keeping the travel ban in place while the courts considered the issue would cause irreparable harm. in its appeal of that ruling the department justice argued that