play, and there is an election not too far off in australia. it could be argued that the government s actions, both the confusion over the visa and the subsequent court actions, have fired things up as well. yeah, they really have changed their argument considerably from the first round of appeals when it was all about the paperwork that djokovic had. the right kind of exemption. was he ticking the right boxes? the grounds they re arguing are now ideological that djokovic could be a corrosive influence in society, his anti-vax views could in some ways spur the anti-vax movement to greater attraction among the community. anti-vax is not especially common in australia, especially compared to america, let s say, but it is a austsmall, strong community that s embraced djokovic as an icon. those are the arguments the government was making that this guy s influence here as a champion really could sow a lot of support for this movement