Know what question never once crossed my mind . Who played for clarence tomlinsons motor home . But as soon as the New York Times asked the question, i felt like, okay, im going to read the article. But do i really have to . Im just gonna find out the name of the rich guy who paid for him. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is gonna join us with his reactions to the latest turn in the road, so to speak, for Clarence Thomas. The Supreme Court ethics thing, i feel like its a banging your head against the wall, because the more on planetary and consequential the ethical like, literally, financial, ethical Conflict Of Interest issues are exposed, just the clear it gets they dont feel they need to answer anybody, they dont feel constrained by any rules, no matter what you expose, theyre never gonna do anything about it. I feel like Sheldon Whitehouse is the one member of the u. S. Senator was consistent consistently optimistic that something can and should be done. So, im glad youve got him. I will
Felt like, okay, im going to read the article. But do i really have to . Im just gonna find out the name of the rich guy who paid for him. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is gonna join us with his reactions to the latest turn in the road, so to speak, for Clarence Thomas. The Supreme Court ethics thing, i feel like its a banking your head against the wall, because the more on planetary and consequential the ethical like, literally, financial, ethical Conflict Of Interest issues are exposed, just the clear it gets they dont feel they need to answer anybody, they dont feel constrained by any rules, no matter what you expose, theyre never gonna do anything about it. I feel like Sheldon Whitehouse is the one member of the u. S. Senator was consistent consistently optimistic that something can and should be done. So, im glad youve got him. I will ask him how his head feels. [laughter] very good. Thank you, rachel. Thank you. Well, weve had a flurry of motions filed tonight by Donald Trumps curre
forcing them to have a change in perspective, and not a change in hard. so, as we go to the special session, and as we move forward, the tennessee that is being dealt is a tendency that is rooted in hope, justice, and protest for what we know to be right and what we deserve across the spectrum. multiracial, multi ethnic, multi socioeconomic, multi generational movement from justice here in the south. what did you learn in your first term and the legislature that will inform your second term? we must listen to the people, and we have to sometimes risk it all in order for the people s voices to be heard. there is no way for us to get justice without some sacrifices. for us, it was a sacrificing, unfortunately, of our seat in our democracy. but it is also the truth that the phoenix does rise from the ashes, and that the communities that are being oppressed and pushed to the periphery will be brought to the center of the conversation, and that the people who are told that their voices
judge chutkan is a jack smith dream judge. she is a judge with integrity. we all know that nothing scares donald trump more than a judge who is actually gonna uphold the rule of law. and i think you are exactly right when you talked about that biden quote that is in the filing today, which is wrong on multiple levels. the most obvious way in which it s wrong is that joe biden is not the prosecutor in this case. indeed, he has nothing to do with it. jack smith is a career prosecutor, independent of the political chain of the justice department. he is operating as special counsel, and the rules i know, because i wrote them when i was a young justice of the department stat, which gives him independents. biden has nothing to do with the prosecution whatsoever. the other thing about it, that quote, you know, the original context is not just the language if trump runs, but also joe biden says he would only do this with, quote, legitimate efforts within our constitution. and so, that is not t
got reversed last week for forgetting to swear jurors in, which is beyond a rookie mistake. and i do believe that the justice department has authorized an appeal and obtained a switch of judges in similar circumstances because you can t have a judge, for example, disclosing sensitive information, if that in fact what happened. i just said, we just don t know very much. but andrew is absolutely right. there is nothing wrong with a d. c. grand jury investigating this, because there is obstruction activity that took place in washington, d. c.. indeed, jack smith could have easily charge this entire thing in d. c.. but perhaps that is still providing course harry litman, what are jack smith s options? look, the department, as neal and andrew said, they could choose this as the time to go after her. she s got a couple of strikes on her. it s a little tough. my best guess is they won t use this to really go to that. they ll wait for something more severe. but as andrew and neal said, i