lawyer about whether clark would cooperate with the house committee. if clark refuses to cooperate with the committee he risks being held in criminal contempt so at some point clark has to make a decision that is quite common with people in donald trump s orbit is he more afraid of donald trump or more afraid of going to jail? let s for the moment assume attorney driscoll who is no longer representing clark is making honorable choices here. would it for example be an honorable choice if the lawyer said i m not going to represent you if you do cooperate with the committee. if the lawyer thinks that is not in the best interests of his client, then he certainly is entitled to do that. he has to get permission from the judge and explain his reasoning to the judge but if
contempt. so at some point, clark has to make a decision that is quite common with people in donald trump s orbit. is he more freed of donald trump, or is the more fruit of going to do? let s for the moment assume that attorney driscoll, who is no longer representing clark, is making honorable choices here. would it, for example, be an honorable choice if the lawyer said, i am not going to represent to if you do cooperate with the committee? if the lawyer thinks that that s not in the best interest of his client, then he certainly is entitled to do that, he has to get permission from the judge, and explain his reasoning to the judge, but if the judge approves it, he can quit the case. but, in an instance like this, where there is no judge, that would be in a courtroom in