movement ends up killing black people. and this is our new favorite, the so called world economic forum seems to exist to destroy national economy. not an overstatement. it was the wef that told the government of sri lanka to give up modern fertilizer. good plan, guys. try it. result, the country collapsed and people starved. then it was the wef that promoted sam bankman fried s historic ponzi. apparently the savant at the world s economic forum just couldn t tell this twitchy pill popping kid in cargo shorts who played video games during interviews was a scammer. they had no idea. they thought he was a genius, just like them. and, of course, it was the wef that predicted the covid lockdowns would, quote, quietly improve cities not turn them into ominous hell scape of drug addiction and crime. it seemed like a good plan at the time. i have got an idea. let s prevent people from working nap will make them rich. it will quietly improve life for everyone. that s the world eco
Questions being asked at this weeks Global Ai Safety Summit in south korea. The second of its kind, it is co hosted with britain after the inaugural event in november last year at Bletchley Park near london. Francine bennett is interim director at the Ada Lovelace Institute an independent Research Institute specialising in al and is in south korea for this summit. A very warm welcome to the programme. So first of all, what will be achieved in seoul, do you think . Do you think . Well, thats a aood do you think . Well, thats a good question. Do you think . Well, thats a good question. I do you think . Well, thats a good question. I hope do you think . Well, thats a good question. I hope what| do you think . Well, thats a good question. I hope what will be achieved in seoul is moving on from the conversation from the Bletchley Summit Last year. So we had some really good initial conversations there, and i think what wasnt to see is shaping the development of this, potentially very new te
That was the general messaging and certainly the feeling, what was believed, what was in the organisation. Believed, what was in the oruanisation. ,. , , believed, what was in the oruanisation. ,. ,. , organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know and organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know and it organisation. Sea cant identify an individual . Know and it would organisation. Sea cant identify an| individual . Know and it would have been over a individual . Know and it would have been over a number individual . Know and it would have been over a number of individual . Know and it would have been over a number of years. Individual . Know and it would have been over a number of years. It. Been over a number of years. It wouldnt have been just one person. That was the understanding within the organisation at the time. There are parts of the organisation i wasnt aware
Are the first six on the list. Yes. Did ou are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have responsibility are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have responsibility for l are the first six on the list. Yes. Did you have responsibility for any of those . , did you have responsibility for any of those . Lilo. Can we did you have responsibility for any of those . Ilo. Can we turn to page of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry. Of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at the of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at the time, of those . No. Can we turn to page three . Sorry, not at the time, i i three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt. Three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt nor three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt. Nor in three . Sorry, not at the time, i didnt. Nor in december three .
Statement in which she said she only became formally aware of the bugs and effects within the Horizon System in 2013, and prior to that she said she was aware of what she called rumblings about the system. She was pressed over when she learned of the horizon a bug. Jason beer asked her if she was aware that fujitsu had for me notified the post office of the receipts of Payments Mismatches on october 2020, she replied, she was not aware of that, she added she was not aware of a meeting between fujitsu and the post office in october 2010 to discuss the bug and she said she dont have that in 2013 and she was also asked towards the end of the session why the onus was on postmasters to prove their innocence rather than the post office to prove their guilt, she replied, i think back then the assumption was that if there was a loss in the branch, that it was the responsibility of the postmaster. Mr beer noted that there was a lot of assuming going on and she agreed. The inquiry is now taking