Recent piece of evidence that invoked them was a text message from hannity to meadows that said the white house counsels will walk if the president doesn t cut it out. any sense of them being in the room may witness up witnesses like sean hannity if not in communication was cognizant of what they would do? i would have thought that they asked cipollone about the hannity text and curious why he had insight into the counsel potentially threatening to quit. we know in the days before the january 6 attack cipollone was part of a meeting that had in addition multiple very senior doj officials who met with the president who said that they would all quit if the president replaced the attorney general with jeffrey clarke who was another senior doj official on board with the president s project. that meeting itself has gotten a
Books and throw open the doors but i m also a student of history and cipollone is not the first one to do so. don mcgahn was the primary narrator of the second volume, the crimes committed by donald trump. that were documented and detailed in that report. i think six of them is don mcgahn as a key witness. this is the second white house counsel who s gone out of a spirit of confession, a spirit of inside knowledge, out of a spirit of knowing that crimes were committed. talk about another white house counsel opening up door to what donald trump s west wing actually looked like. i d push back a little bit on the idea that cipollone is actually opening the door. we know that he testified that trump authorized the engage wmt the committee. that s all we know. if the past is any prologue the white house counsels just say