Firm, locked contract into an at-will employment that says, listen, we have violated some of our clauses and he has every right to be paid out and certainly, they would have more cause to have leverage over him for that reason and in full disclosure, i used to work for the very law firm that his attorneys represent him with and there are attorneys that certainly have earned the reputation, but it does not change the fact that this is, indeed a big scar on the fox news network legacy, whether it was paid by bill o reilly and otherwise precisely where fox news said we had no idea this was going on and this sounds like, in fact, they may have been, maybe wanot complicit, bu all knowing. brian stelter and laura kurtz, thank you very much. how does wells fargo come back from the explosive fake account scandal.
Waffle house is within their rights conceivably she may not have violated the policy but she likely violated the law by firing a weapon in the air as people ran away. she hasn t been charged with violating the law. if everybody that violldn t hav people. waffle house canned her for violating their own anti-firearm policy, which i say this employee did not violate any way. and that s an important point, heather. we looked on the internet, a lot of waffle houses have signs up that say gun-free zones. they allow law enforcement. but the fact that she did it outside, albeit on waffle house s dime because she was still working on the clock, does that matter whether she s inside or outside? unless they said to her, you re being fired for violating this policy, they can it s at-will employment.
Will on you. not from at will employment. and the only thing to say to this on all sides, tolerance needs to be reciprocal. and respected. and that was not respectful. what he said was not respectful. from the selective and not respectful yes or no? to was it someone who said what he believed yes or no that was already on the record? i m assuming he believes what he says but also deserves to hear what other people believe. go ahead, diana. i was going to say probably the delivery, it was a little crass, not the scripture the article they wrote. this is why i m a cynic. it was written and they wrote it. you know who i blame the most at this? a&e s publicist who stepped out of the room. this is a reality star who happened to fall into fame. he sells duck calls for a living.
The market hasn t made its decision with cracker barrel? it absolutely did. it didn t just make its decision with cracker barrel, it made the decision a long time ago with walmart. a long time ago, even with a&e, the amount of viewers it gets with duck dynasty. this is the reason underarmour didn t pull away no matter how many people ended up criticizing phil robertson. i think the backlash went more toward a&e more than anything else. and the people here who i think are going to benefit most are going to be the robertsons here. and the bottom line here on this is people will be watching duck dynasty by the millions. to me this is brilliant, marketing, people can debate, he has a right to his position, the first amendment protects you from government imposing its will on you. not from at will employment.
Years, no violations and let her do it for three years. yeah, no problem. now you re out. let me go to the statistics here. 175 million boxes of girl scout cookies are sold a year. annual sales, 656 million and one gal, jennifer sharp, 17, 328 boxes, she sold. why am i bringing these statistics up. ten seconds to win the debate. in d.c., it s an at-will state at the will of the employer and they can fire you for no reason as long as they don t discriminate. i m done. megyn: tom? can i respond? the at-will employment, the law of the land. however, news flash, sometimes employers are firing people for discriminatory purposes don t come out and say we re firing someone for discriminatory purposes. what do we know about the woman? we know she s a female, right? we know she s a mom and we know she s a racial minority.