The flawed application of a Christian-European lens to the understanding of Bharat’s social organisation laid the foundations for its contemporary interpretations
the president. we re now getting final verdict on who told the truth in the vice-presidential debate and who was not. fa fa factcheck.org writing, quote, the biden/ryan debate was marked by some spirited claims that didn t always match the facts. pushed the factual envelope. good saturday afternoon to both of you. let s talk about benghazi and the debate over security measures taken before the fatal attack there. take a listen. shouldn t we have a marine depatchment guarding our ambassador in benghazi? a place where we knew there was an al qaeda cell with arms? this lecture on embassy security, the congressman here cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for, number one.
to the new york times, quote, i believe that god designed the universe and created the june krers and i believe evolution is most likely the process he used to create the human body. there s a view that tries to bridge science and religion. i know you have said in the past you are an obama guy, you re voting for the president. what do you think of governor romney s view? it s okay. it s okay. as i said, i m not going to address anybody s religion. this is not what i m talking about. what we do in science and critical thinking, you have a claim, an assertion. in this case, the earth is 6,000 years old or 10,000 years old. i can show any reasonable right that is not right. that s wrong. that s a wrong claim and it s off by a factor of a million. furthermore, evolution is fact. we can prove evolution to you. we re going to if you want to deny that stuff, you re setting aside what
peevish. they both really don t like being challenged very much. so i think their advisers as they re doing the debate prep are telling them when to take a deep breath. i suspect the people playing each of them for each other are trying to get up in their face to get under their skin because that is a weakness that they share. we re talking ad nauseum about the presidential debate. i for one can t wait to see the biden/ryan debate. don t go anywhere. coming up next, tomorrow today. we ll give folks a sneak peek of what you should know for tomorrow. you are of course watching msnbc, the place for politics. fr hat should we invest in? maybe new buildings? what about updated equipment? they can help, but recent research shows. .nothing transforms schools like investing in advanced teacher education. let s build a strong foundation.
say a lot of things that aren t accurate. and i d be tempted to go back to that wonderful line by ronald reagan, there you go again. i think the challenge that i ll have in the debate is that the president tends to, how shall i say it, say things that aren t true. is that the only challenge that mitt romney will have in those debates? i thought that was a remarkable line. i m glad you spotlighted it. this is classic rovian projection. you take your weakness and you immediately preemptively project it on the other candidate. and it sometimes confuses the recent. we talked earlier about your problems that the obama administration has had on transparency, but there is no doubt when you look at the factual record of these two campaigns that its n is not clo. the mitt romney campaign has repeatedly lied on fundamental issue including in the spot lift t light of the national conventions. if you look it at the fact checking, several material