Piece of that where meadows speaks on that call. the first voice that you hear is not meadows and it is the lawyer who works with the state of georgia. i m happy to sit down and have our lawyers sit down and the lawyers on that side and explain to him, hey, here based on what we looked at so far here s how we know this is wrong, this is wrong, this is wrong, this is wrong. so what you re saying, ryan. hold on, let me make sure. so what you re saying is you really don t want to give access to the data. you just want to make another case on why the lawsuit is wrong? i don t think we i don t think we can give access to data that s protected by law, but we can sit down with them but you re allowed to have a phony election? you re allowed to have a phony election? right? no, sir. so that s the type of evidence that the judge, the federal judge hearing this argument section tomorrow will be looking at potentially as
Let me make sure. what you re saying is you really don t want to give access to the data. you just want to make another case on why the lawsuit is wrong? i don t think we i don t think we can give access to data that s protected by law. but we can sit down with them and but you re allowed to have a phony election? you re allowed to have a phony election, right? no, sir. reporter: so that s the type of evidence that the judge, the federal judge hearing this argument section tomorrow, is going to be looking at, potentially as well hearing from the multiple witnesses, including brad raffensperger who has been subpoenaed to this hearing to testify. so maybe a mini trial in some ways. and we did recognize the voice at the end of that clip there. there s also a hearing coming up tomorrow in the special counsel s january 6th case. that could be important as well. what can you tell us? it s all about trial dates, jim. that is going to be the conversation in a lot of realms
Think we can get access to data that s protected by law but we can sit down with them but you re allowed to have a phony election? you re allowed to have a phony election? no, sir. so, that s the type of evidence that the judge, the federal judge hearing this argument section is going to be looking at, potentially as well as hearing from multiple witnesses including brad raffensperger who has been subpoenaed to his appearing to testify. so maybe a mini trial we could have some isn t ways. and we will learn the trial date for donald trump. special counsel jack smith is asking for it. and they re pushing after the election. floridians on the gulf coast should be vigilant, even currently outside the cone, indeed, you could see impacts if you are in a place outside the
Significant possibility that manafort was going to be sent to jail. and certainly by the time they finished with the argument section, which lasted maybe a little bit over an hour to an hour and a half, we saw the fbi agents conferring out in the hall in what seemed to me to be them making some preparations for what was going to come next for mr. manafort. i don t think they knew exactly, but i think they had a sense of what was coming. so certainly very tense. it was the most packed courtroom i ve seen there for any manafort hearing since his arraignment last october. and the judge gave sort of a head fake when it was time to give the ruling. she suggested maybe that she was maybe going to give him one more chance, but eventually said she couldn t trust manafort. there had simply been too much a history of him seeming to skirt her orders and another judge s orders, and she just didn t think she could trust him to abide by whatever conditions she may impose.