which has already brought hundred of charges in connection with the capitol assault do with the information the select committee has uncovered? and will these hearings generate the kind of political consensus that might be needed before the attorney general decides to aim as high as the select committee is already suggesting might be necessary? president trump summoned the mob, assembled the mob and lit the flame of this attack. you will also hear about plots to commit seditious conspiracy on january 6th, a crime defined in our laws as conspiring to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the government of the united states or to oppose by force the authority thereof. when committee vice chair liz cheney said those words plot to commit seditious conspiracy while putting former president trump in a plot the implication was hard to miss. prior to the proceedings attorney general merrick garland said he intended to watch the hearings, and he apparently wasn t the only one.
manner, lay out the fact that this has been his message throughout, and he believes, based on his legislative accomplishments, many of which were bipartisan like this agreement here, that he has delivered results, and i think the jobs numbers today underscore they feel like there s real strength in the economy. i think the big question, which has long been the case, can they connect that reality, in their minds, to where voters are. the president s approval ratings are no secret. the views of the economy, the direction of the country aren t either. this could be a moment given this has been hanging over the administration for the better part of six months where they see a pivot point, an opportunity to really deliver that message, where they feel like they ve gotten results, critical moment to do so, given the fact the general election is a year away. whether or not that will actually happen though, an open question, certainly a first start tonight, anderson. phil mattingly, apprecia
and they have done that here apparently. what makes you think it was this group, jane s revenge, that attacked your facility? they left their signature calling card, number one, spray painted on the side of the building. who exactly jane s revenge remains unclear. they have allegedly taken responsibility for a similar attack last month on a conservative organization that lobbies against abortion in madison, wisconsin. there, a message spraypainted on the building s wall read if abortions aren t safe, then aren t either. i am standing in front of a sign that is threatening my life. madison police tweeted they are aware of a group claiming responsibility for the arson at wisconsin family action, and are working with federal partners to determine the voracity of that claim. and there have been other similar cases. a florida doctor tweeted about damage to the south broward pregnancy help center where she volunteers. the spray painted message reads, if abortions aren t safe, then