Being a lot lower in 02 this year than they were last year. As we well remember, they were running up sharply by last year. Bp has realised that prices were down by just under 40 year on year and a biggerfall, they realise just under 40 year on year and a bigger fall, they realise that gas price, 45 and also down by a 30 , that explains why the puppet are lower this year than last year. Lower, but still quite an impressive number nonetheless. It will always raise criticisms about windfall tax with big energy firms doing well on the back of these prices, though as you have said, they have come down from their peaks. Bp is not a big player in the uk any more. Its from their peaks. Bp is not a big player in the uk any more. Its not a big player. Player in the uk any more. Its not a big player. But player in the uk any more. Its not a big player, but reasonably a big player, but reasonably important. They pay tax there and i think, looking at figures, it is gone away, given the price of co
gone away, given the price of come down, there is less when full taxes here than the ones last year. they are not as big a player anywhere nearas are not as big a player anywhere near as they were a few years ago. most of the profits accrue from overseas operations, including in the us. ., ., , overseas operations, including in the us. ., ., , the us. and therefore as a result, the us. and therefore as a result, the wind full the us. and therefore as a result, the wind full tax the us. and therefore as a result, the wind full tax have the us. and therefore as a result, the wind full tax have a the us. and therefore as a result, the wind full tax have a minimum| the wind full tax have a minimum effect on bp. the wind full tax have a minimum effect on br the wind full tax have a minimum effect on bp. very minimal effect. the fact that effect on bp. very minimal effect. the fact that profits effect on bp. very minimal effect. the fact that profits are effect on bp. very