He can express any views he was. Wants. The big mistake was not recusing himself. When he tweeted he would make sure trump doesnt become president and has an insurance policy, he could not be fair and just. By not recusing himself, he violated his position of trust. I would not go too far and blame it on the top authorities of the fbi. They didnt know. When they did know, they demoted him and took him out of the investigation. I think its a blemish, but i dont think its a fatal flaw in the investigation. I think there are deeper and more fatal flaws. Ultimately i think it was the right decision. Tucker dont those texts suggest why he didnt recuse himself . Its one thing to express a political opinion. Do i it for a leaving. Living. He was suggesting that his opinions would drive the crimmial investigation that he was conducting. Thats subversion of justice. Thats the issue. He denied under oath that in any way he was influenced by his hatred for thump in any of his professional decisio
To improve the performance of our website, show the most relevant news products and targeted advertising, we collect technical impersonal information about you, including through the tools of our partners. You can find a detailed description of how we use your data in our Privacy Policy. For a detailed description of the technologies, please see the Cookie and Automatic Logging Policy.
By clicking on the Accept & Close button, you provide your explicit consent to the processing of your data to achieve the above goal.
You can withdraw your consent using the method specified in the Privacy Policy.
Accept & Close
Sputnik International
turned on by it. you may run into the assistant deputy under-secretary of whatever from the white house that you saw on tv when she it a restaurant. and you might beat her up. and maxine waters would encourage to you do that. we have people who are on the same continnium as the killers who think the answer those guys were witty and amusing and intelligent people killed by guys who don t know anything except how to kick the door down and kill you. that s these guys in antifa are the same thing. they can t make an argument. they are morons. but they are morons who have the scent of blood in their nostrils. tucker: when you give up on speech, you wind up with violent. that s right. tucker: thank you.
vox.com and a record of honesty re-in a piece called antifa clashes with police and journalists in d.c. that was too close to the truth and there was complain. huffpost tweeted, this is a bad article and a good example of not to cover white super missy. a bad article. in other words, objective truth is bad, whether it obstructs the goal, which is getting power, so lie or else, and most reporters do lie. we don t have to lie. we can say what is obvious by the very people decrying fascism are the ones practicing fascism, crushing as it disagree with them, silencing contrarynd opinions, which they do constantly, threatening violence if they do yesterday. you can call it and i hate all you want to come up with the truth is, they would hurt you i. mark steyn is an author and columnist and guest host of this program for three days last week, did a great job, we are happy to have him back. mark, you saw the video, just so you know, those are anti-hate
fox.com ran a piece called antifa clashes with police and journalist in charlottesville and d.c. that was too close to the truth for many on the left and they complained. one tweeted this: in other words objective truth is bad when it obstructs the goal which is gaining power. lie or else. we can say what is obvious. the people decrying fascism are crushing those who disagree with them and threatening violence as they did yesterday. they can call it anti-hate all they want but they would hurt if you they could. mark stein is an author and columnist. we are happy to have him back. you saw the video.