First, former president trum legal team turns the tables laying out their arguments against impeachment and forget their brevity. In a few concrete ways, they dismantled key pieces of the democrats rather incoherent constitutional argument. I will break down a few pieces tonight for you. The most important ones. The core claim of democrats Impeachment Article is that trump Speech Incited the januar. His speech on january six, here is strong counsel michael vanderveen. The senate should be extremely careful about the president the president this case has set. Consider the language that the house Impeachment Article alleges to constitute to incite. If you dont fight like hell, you not going to have a country anymore. This is ordinary political rhetoric that is virtually indistinguishable from the language that has been used by people across the political spectrum. For hundreds of years. And he had the example. Democrats are going to fight. We fight. We are going to fight like hr hrll we
And give the latest from the multiple scandals now rocking the antitrump Lincoln Project. Now in complete meltdown mode. Meghan mccain, wow, unleashed brutal tweets tonight. One of their cone founders, Steve Schmidt, just resigned in disgrace. But first, the democrats snap impeachment charade sham, it just faced its day of reckoning. Finally, the president s Legal Defense team, they completely eviscerated all of the democrats paperthin arguments, all of which were, as we told you, unconstitutional. None of which meet any real Legal Standard that would ever hold up in any court. No rules of evidence matter in any way, shape, matter, or form, and to add to that, they are editing, slicing, dicing, and then purposely ignoring all damaging, exculpatory evidence, and presided over by a judge who already declared trump guilty. Wow. This is the United States of america. Thats a kangaroo court. The House Managers, they were eviscerated on their argument over incitement. Their favorite word, ins