There was an agreement between one or more persons to achieve the object of the conspiracy and that was set forth in the indictment. The government is really going to set forth a pretty narrow number of charges here and frankly, it would not be unexpected if they had a convention on some and not others conviction. It is frankly expected in these types of cases. The indictment in these types of cases. The indictment is in these types of cases. The indictment is also in these types of cases. The indictment is also mentioned six Co Conspirators, none have been charged in this indictment. For attorneys, a former Department Of Justice official at a political us to leave i consulted who aided trumps efforts. Why do you think they were not charged . Trumps efforts. Why do you think they were not charged . Thats a good cuestion. I they were not charged . Thats a good question i was they were not charged . Thats a good question. I was expecting they were not charged . Thats a good question. I w
There, but no one has ever taught the defence that your lawyers told you you could do it. that would be called a mistake of law defence. that somehow you understood it to be legal to assault someone and one of the first things we learn in criminal law is that mistake of law is no excuse. so even if you went out and found the 100 worst lawyers in america to tell him what he wanted to do was ok, it would make no difference if it was actually against the law and certainly it was. ~ ., ., against the law and certainly it was. . . ., ., ., . was. what about another defence strate: was. what about another defence strategy that was. what about another defence strategy that we was. what about another defence strategy that we have was. what about another defence strategy that we have seen - was. what about another defence strategy that we have seen from | was. what about another defence i strategy that we have seen from the former president, they re pointing to the first amendment that tr
And so they couldn t countenance that especially going into the mid-term elections. so once that happened they adopted a strategy, which is anything they do we re going to call partisan. and they sort of by putting jordan and banks on this committee, guys who are january 6th deniers, they essentially really were baiting pelosi. and they re doing what you know i would do. they re saying this would be a partisan exercise, but it would be an anti-exercise if you have people on the committee who are there simply to blow the thing up, and that s what those guys were there to do. and the speaker knew very well that they were doing exactly what david said, baiting her into saying no way, those two have no business being on this committee because they don t agree on the basic set of facts that you need to agree onto setout on a mission. so she s faced with does she take the bait, she knows it s