have. we currently already have it s a little bit confusing. okay. we re talking about any curbside not just to curb stops. curb spaces i m not sure one moment please - sorry commissioners i ll hand out the builds so you can look at them one of the reasons we recommended the watch level it is not clear it is an extremely short bill so ab 61 here we go. but you re saying if under the existing legislative structure localities can set up agreements like the shuttle did i know the bill doesn t explain i m asking what the current - what the current situation is what a united states current situation. the m t does have the authority. it s not clear what this legislation is needed for and i think that could be fair. thanks. supervisor campos please. thank you just a quick question for staff my understanding is that what this bill does and this is unique is that in addition to being redundant because the local jurisdictions have that authority as evidenced we did th
jessie larson and marcus book store. supervisor breed supervisor breed absent. commissioner christensen supervisor farrell absent supervisor tang supervisor yee we have quorum. thank you if we can please call item 2. citizens advisors report this is an information item. thank you i d like to call up our cac chair. i m the new chair of the cac so good to be here i want to give a brief update on item 6 forced the lifeline program and item 8 the reprogramming of the grant fund on our agenda all items passed with no one opposed and a little bit more specific on item 6 they wanted to mob that the lgbt prop fund were for the community of concern and jackie saks wanted to be sure that we ll precede and both concerns were addressed by staff and item 7 the cac involved the rectangular rapid flashing beacons and how the location were alcohol and sfmta staff was forthcoming on the other item there was only positive comments on the fund swap i wanted to mention an item not on
drivers this clarifies that and i think that the staffs again, i m not making a motion to support this this is in the early stamps but we can tell it is moving in the direction to clarify state law those kinds of agreements are permissible that s why we should move to a watch position. any further discussion just to recap a motion made to reverse the decision from the finance commission - committee to the prefer decision by the finance committee to oppose sate bill 61 and that was seconded by supervisor tang mr. clerk but with let could roll call vote. let s take public comment on this item please. seeing no public comment public comment is closed. roll call vote. supervisor avalos no supervisor breed. supervisor campos no. supervisor christensen supervisor cowen supervisor farrell supervisor kim no supervisor mar no arrest supervisor tang supervisor wiener supervisor yee absent amendment passes. thank you mr. clerk, call the next item. i need you to do a vote
item comes back with the matrix every month. so for clarification the consultants made the recommendation for us to opts. this was a staff recommendation and mark keeps track of it but that s a staff recommendation excuse me. the finance took the action to switch position. so there s a motion it on the table and seconded by supervisor tang excuse me. supervisor campos thank you, madam chair i m sure you re aware of those of us who serve on the finance committee voted to oppose it was a unanimous votes ones the finance committee the reason we right let me see voted in that way because let s be very clear about this this is about privatizing public space to the stent there is a need for something like that there s an argument that the jurisdictions already have that authority and what this is is basically, the state legislator yet again responding to the political powders the tech industry for another give away like the one in san francisco and trying to take this show on
what this is is basically, the state legislator yet again responding to the political powders the tech industry for another give away like the one in san francisco and trying to take this show on the road i don t know if even can say that we know that this is going to impact what s happening here in san francisco so there s a clear reason why the finance committee unanimously voted to oppose and i respectfully ask that you vote to affirm what the finance committee had a thorough discussions decided. thank you very much supervisor mar. i ll agree there was a good and thorough discussion not only with our lobbyists in san francisco but the members of the finance committee i ll support the recommendation to oppose and my resident from my community district 1 and others have been watching this and ask we take an opposed position as well i stronger urge we innovate amend this and support the finance departments decision i want to say another item on the same page right below i