the caravan has exposed problems along the border. we need to address those problems. after the caravan, the question is do we needs more security money or less. i think most people would say more. it s an unreasonable position for them to take that $5 billion is too much wasteful when they voted for a lot more than that in the past. what s got me some energized here is that we ve done in the past more than what the president is asking for. he s not the bad guy here. lou: now the bad guys are identified usually as radical dimms in both the house and the senate. despite the president s demand for $5 billion to fund that border wall, house rinos are still pretending they have the votes to support it. those votes do not exist in the senate. i repeat, they do not mean anything as i know the bill is dead on arrival once it does reach the senate as it would lack the 60 votes needed to stop a filibuster. and secretary of state pompeo setting the record straight today on the pres
the caravan has exposed problems along the border. we need to address those problems. after the caravan, the question is do we needs more security money or less. i think most people would say more. it s an unreasonable position for them to take that $5 billion is too much wasteful when they voted for a lot more than that in the past. what s got me some energized here is that we ve done in the past more than what the president is asking for. he s not the bad guy here. lou: now the bad guys are identified usually as radical dimms in both the house and the senate. despite the president s demand for $5 billion to fund that border wall, house rinos are still pretending they have the votes to support it. those votes do not exist in the senate. i repeat, they do not mean anything as i know the bill is dead on arrival once it does reach the senate as it would lack the 60 votes needed to stop a filibuster. and secretary of state pompeo setting the record straight today on the pres
the caravan has exposed problems along the border. we need to address those problems. after the caravan, the question is do we needs more security money or less. i think most people would say more. it s an unreasonable position for them to take that $5 billion is too much wasteful when they voted for a lot more than that in the past. what s got me some energized here is that we ve done in the past more than what the president is asking for. he s not the bad guy here. lou: now the bad guys are identified usually as radical dimms in both the house and the senate. despite the president s demand for $5 billion to fund that border wall, house rinos are still pretending they have the votes to support it. those votes do not exist in the senate. i repeat, they do not mean anything as i know the bill is dead on arrival once it does reach the senate as it would lack the 60 votes needed to stop a filibuster. and secretary of state pompeo setting the record straight today on the pres
and which is now directly in opposition to us interest in american historical sphere of unrivaled influence. that is, north and south america. and surrounding seas and oceans. russia and china have quietly merged and energized elements of their respected foreign policies that at first insinuates both countries into this hemisphere and second, establishes new relationships to directly challenge us policies and interests. russia in league with venezuela, china partnering with panama, a strengthening challenge to the world s only superpower and a challenge that can no longer be ignored without paying a heavy price. we take up the rising possibility of competition between the united states and china and russia in this hemisphere. gordon chang joins us tonight. also, tonight president trump continues his fight for american business and consumers demanding an end to china s unfair trade practices and theft of us technology and intellectual property. president trump: we cannot conti
lawful actions of our president. some dimms, we spite the warnings of some of their leaders, crying out for impeachment or indictment of the president after the phony russian witch hunt found no evidence of any collusion whatsoever. are you in a position to consider discussing impeachment in congress? i think we have to be. i think they might seek to indict donald trump here. even if your sitting president can t be indicted, he s got to know that his future looks like it s behind bars. lou: legal scholars such as harvard professor alan dershowitz investigating the claims of the special counsel and the efforts of the dimms radical left wing new york state governments and attorney s office to persecute and harass president trump and subvert his administration. dershowitz saying that mueller failed in his effort to take down this president. the takeaway is that mueller has come up with far less than he hoped for e s not getting cooperation obviously from manafort. mana