this is a more complicated case than most. i don t think i ve said anything and correct so far and i don t want to step into something that i ve already done. i am inclined though, because i made a statement about if everything is present, and i do think i should probably give the alternative which is, and i m not going to use terms likes perfect self-defense like he did. i m going to use the term, acted lawfully in self-defense. they are instructed on that. so i think that a correct statement is, if as to any of the cases of multiple submissions, if on any individual account they find in their consideration of the charged offense that the defendant acted lawfully in self-defense, they are done. any objection? no. while we are talking about the jury instructions, it was noticed as you read them, on page ten, which is count three, it should be first be reckless endangerment. and you ve written and you read homicide, which is not a homicide count. on page ten? top of pa
national guard on standby as at the state prepares for potential unrest. sandra: coverage begins now andy mccarthy is here to weigh in. john: first, alexis mcadam in kenosha, wisconsin, with the very latest that wrapping up from the trial. we have seen 30%-40% of prosecution. what we know so far? good afternoon. a lot unfolding here in kenosha. closing arguments have just started and they took a break. the jury went on for lunch and they will come back in about one hour or so. one of the important things to realize in this investigation in this trial is that the judge dismissed a weapons charge against carl rittenhouse. it was count six. they dropped it based off of the size of the weapon that was used under wisconsin law. that was account six for a dangerous weapon by person under 18 years old. just hours ago, the court ruling that the language in wisconsin law does not actually ban a 17-year-old from carrying a rifle with a long barrel. he was 17 when he shot three me