To understand first is our conflict of interest? we verify that the work was different. reclaiming my time. mr. eastern filed this is you putting yourself as the czar of conflicts. your scheme worked really well for mckenzie. mckenzie got contracts purdue goderich and america got addicted. since 2008 mackenzie earn 100 and $40 million in contracts from the fda. and you did not ever disclose your work for purdue. you did not disclose your conflicts of interest. so my question for you as since you didn t disclose the conflicts of interest. will you return to $140 million to the fda? so they were working for the biggest opioid pusher on the planet purdue pharma. and the fda. at the same time. absolutely. the same people. the same people at the same time. now it s possible and this is
Was working for the fda and purdue at the same time? did you disclose that the fda? we made clear in multiple instances that the individuals involved had experience in both pharmaceuticals and opioid reclaiming my time. they didn t have experience, they would be identical humans working for both at the same time, did you tell the fda did you make these disclosures and then allow the government to decide if there was a conflict of interest? when we assessed the worked product and request, we brought professionals, our dedicated legal team, to understand, was there a conflict of interest? we did find that the work was different. reclaiming my time. but mr. sternfels, that is you putting yourself as the czar of conflicts. you are scheme worked well for mckenzie mackenzie got contracts. purdue got rich and america got