city cab the truth is i m lucky to be alive because of the driving and this town is psychotic. new york is the only city in th world where you signal after you ve made it to the next lane. anywhere else in america if you want to go left to put on your blinker like you re going left. if you do that here they block you. instead you have to go left in then you put on your blinker like hot hot. i made it. the other thing you need to kno about me as i grew up in an era where late-night comedy was something the whole country could share. that s what life was in the 1980 s. every regular person could shar late-night and every celebrity could share madonna. if you did not laugh at that is because it burns when your peep. stick with me. tonight when i will try to do i unite the country with some basic truths i think which i ll be able to agree on. i do not let you allow that but you need to remember these are just jokes. if you don t like something i say get on at the ganglion hold of
anyone. none of his advisers wanted to hear his views on foreign policy. they wanted trump to be quiet. he wouldn t. what is the point of nato he asked 30 years after the fall of soviet union. shut up racist. trump kept going. why would we fight russia, he wondered. wouldn t making russia our enemy drive putin in to the arms of china and create the most anti-american block in history? nobody bothered to answer him. they impeached him for it and starred a war with putin. in retrospect, trump asked a deeply patriotic question. if russia ever joined forces with china, american global power would end instantly. you d have the world s largest land mall and the natural gas reserves aligned with the world s population and the world s larger economy. a russia china axis would be not just more powerful than the united states but much more powerful. it would have the scale to control a lot of the world s economy and trade routes and raw materials. it could project military force that w
and he did it without the help of anyone.s ad none of his advisors wanteviserg to use on foreign policy. i policyp to b desperately wanted trump to be quiet, bute n trump wouldn t. what s the point of nato ?t nat he asked nearly thirty years y after the fall of the soviet aft union, no one in washington could answer him. p racist shut up. racist, they replied. but trump just kept going in. his trump way. russia, why would we fight russia? he wondered.e wouldn t making russia our our enemy just drive putin into the arms of china? inand create the most powerful and dangerous anti-american bloc in history? no one bothered to answerbody him. in fact, for the sin of asking,y they called him a traitorch to his country.ed him for they impeached him for it. it se ind then they started a war with putin. but in retrospect, trump asked a deeply patriotic question.ue if russista everion. joined fors with china, american global hegemony, its power would end instantly. you d have the w
which that they could indict somebody on, including him? that s the first question. and i think they re getting very close to that point, frankly. but i think at the end of the day, there s another question, it s do you indict a former president? what will that do to the country? what kind of precedent will that set? will the people really understand that this is not failing to return a library book? that this was serious? you have to worry about those things. and i hope that those kinds of factors will inclined the administration not to indict him. because i don t want to see him indicted. it comes as we re learning that the documents seized from mar-a-lago s resort including one on a former government s nuclear capabilities. that s according to the washington post. i want to bring in the former nick akerman, nationalistic bradley moss and cnn political analyst kirsten powers. good to see all three of you. nick, i m gonna start with you. bill barr there. saying that he
the former attorney general, bill barr, weighing in on a potential indictment of donald trump. here s what he said on fox earlier. i think, as i ve said all along, there are two questions. will the government be able to make out a technical case? will they have evidence by which that they could indict somebody on, including him? that s the first question. and i think they re getting very close to that point, frankly. but i think at the end of the day, there s another question, it s do you indict a former president? what will that do to the country? what kind of precedent will that set? will the people really understand that this is not failing to return a library book? that this was serious? you have to worry about those things. and i hope that those kinds of factors will incline the administration not to indict him. because i don t want to see him indicted. it comes as we re learning that the documents seized from mar-a-lago s resort including one on a former government