calls for that. many exchanges like that, ari. i m not a fan on people calling on other people to resign, it is political exclamation point, i get it. i rather deal with issues presented by the memorandum and where justice has a lot of cleaning up to do and white house has a lot of cleeping cleaning up to do. it is a serious matter, they are only going after people why is the agency inside the department of justice, why is it same agency responsible for domestic terrorism, chinese spies, agency merrick garland decided to lead the investigation into people who may commit violence. if violence is committed, it is up to sheriff, state police to take action, action should be
record the acting attorney, u.s. attorney of montana s letter. without objection. it is pretty kind of ark mazing, not unusual republican colleagues continue to focus on something that the attorney general has to continue to testify for the last three hours, whatever it is, that his letter is being mischaracterized and focus on that at the same time, what is real problem is the fact that we have 530 voter suppression bills introduced in 47 states vast majority by republican legislators and people votes are being stolen through the voter suppression actions. do we hear word one about the fact that this is happening all across the country that voter suppression is happening, does a
justification to keep the f.b.i. involved? there is no justification, john. he won t back off from the letter, even though he s been asked to for a simple reason. he committed in his confirmation hearing that he would not politicize the justice department or alaw it to be politicized and that s been done. the school board association consulted closely with the white house and sent this letter and less than a week later, garland cranks out this memo, which isn t a case long and dispatches f.b.i. to essentially harass parents and suppress their decent on circumstances he knows there is no federal jurisdiction. he won t apologize, he would have to acknowledge what he did. john: we want to jump back into the hearing, senator marsha
the purpose of ark asylum adjudication is to allow asylum. this is statutory claim mr. garld, we have a problem at the border and the doj has to recognize part of the problem you ll have to fix. sandra: do you have confidence after that exchange that that will happen? none whatsoever, no way the attorney general can t know that got aways are crossing the border every night, not people looking for border agents, they are evading law enforcement because they are bad people. two or three a night, thousands per month making our nation less safe and making minority neighborhoods and communities the least safe. gang members, drug traffickers,
underscoring attorney general garland s testimony is not credible, not credible for him to say he was sitting at his desk minding his own business and decided to issue this memo. the letter from the school board the white house worked on was dated september 29th. a week later you get the memorandum from attorney general garland. garland has a lengthy career as in federal law enforcement as top official, first in clinton justice department and as distinguished judge of one of the most eminent appellate courts in the united states. he s also as attorney general got access to office of legal counsel and best, most informed minds about criminal law arkinal sis at the federal level in the justice department. this memorandum comes shortly after what he got from the school boards working with the white house, has no citation to any authority and is on a