than they appear. the fight for the democratic presidential nomination has begun. we begin this hour with a go nile from china the country said it was not involved in hacking u.s. government computers and stealing personal information from as many as 4 million federal employees. the obama administration has not formerly blamed china, but the evidence is overwhelming that hack necessary china are linked with one of the largeest thefts of government information data. you re right the office of personnel management known as human resource department for the entire federal government, employees exposed to the attackers and the question the day after it was revealed is who did it. you re right multiple reports point the finger directly at china. while the white house is not agreeing and they re not pointing the finger in public they re not doing anything to lead people away from that conclusion. josh earnest said that the president has confronted china any number of times. the
electoral processes, they are part they prepared the processes and they campaign to be voted or to elect other women to their positions. power positions. and in mozambique we have the experience which is successful, the quota system. i know that in other parts the quota system is not applied because there are people who think that that is a kind of man s marginalization. but in mozambique, it works and it has worked. that s why we have reached such total of women enrolled in decision positions. yes, women participant. we have conflict. and since women are the most affected, they are much more easily are able it s true, not always are they seated at the table the decision table, to solve the conflicts or even after the conflicts. but they are there, and they are the grassroots organizations. and they help build the society. and they help to sustain the societies. so i think that we have to work much more in terms of empowering women to be able themselves to defend themselves
we have set aside a line for residents of charleston, south carolina. we want to get your perspective as well. you can leave a comment also on social media, twitter, facebook, or an e-mail. from the new york times, reverend pinckney was holding a bible study session with a small group on wednesday when surveillance video shows the suspect arrived after 8:00 p.m. a slight blonde man with a bowl haircut and a gray sweatshirt. he sat down with the others for a while and listened, then began to disagree with others as they spoke about scripture, said chris in washington who heard the harrowing story from her family members were at the meeting and survived. witnesses to the killings of the gunman asked for the pastor when he entered the church and sat next to mr. pinckney during the bible study. they said a must in our after he arrived, the government suddenly stood and pulled a gun and is washington s cousin, 26 years old, known as the peacemaker of the family, try to call my t
many reenactments? i m a vietnam era veteran and we don t reenact it but people born decades after the civil war still go out of their way to reenact the great battles. there is something in the american spirit that we are dealing with that can t be casually dismissed. but black folks see a rebel flag and they think ku klux klan immediately. i m talking to fellow americans about this. it is not easy to persuade them otherwise. it is a reality. you don t wave the red cape in front of a bull and don t wave the confederate flag in front of black folks and expect them to clear. host: might, florida, republican mind. caller: good morning, mr. page. first of all i would like to offer my heartfelt condolences to the victims and families in the state of south carolina. it was a horrible action and it always goes back to the gun owners and makes us look bad. what i really want to comment on today is the situation and mr. page mentioned it, talking about gun ownership in comparison wit
impossible to actually apply. and it makes things frustrating for literally everyone. and that can happen as part of regulation. i think you know there are organizations that their expertise is in trying to cut through very complicated issues and come up with very clear guidelines. examples would be compensation programs that get set up or, you know, military, former military members who have been exposed to certain things, what are their criteria? well, you could go through you come up with the most complicated flowchart in the world or basic criteria that are fair and reasonable and able to be applied. the institute of medicine of which i m a member, does this a lot. they take very thorny questions and they say we need to come up with a regime for doing this that is implementable and reasonable that will bring people together across an arab shoe. then they ll say this is an approach that would be in the public interest. and nothing s perfect but this is the best we thin