when keir starmer was first leader, a lot of people did not in anyway think that in one term he could turn the labour party around. they were talking in terms of him doing five years, losing the next election and someone also come in and we don t know who that will be. for them, it has been a big surprise as well. they actually lost the hartlepool by election, it was an absolute low point for labour and then things turned around. lots of people say keir starmer has been a lucky leader, it has come at the same time that in scotland the snp have had their own troubles, socks scotland is a country where labour used to rule and then were absolutely decimated at the last election and went down to one seat. all of thing these things have a line for him but he will say he has change the party from the party it was underjeremy corbyn. the change the party from the party it was underjeremy corbyn. the left of the labour party was underjeremy corbyn. the left of the labour part
Montague. Of being a humourless feminisfi even her harman has been changed to Harriet Harperson to mock her politics. Shes the only woman who has come but even she ruled it out. Why . Was it the partys fault . Or hers . Harriet harman, welcome to hardtalk. Thank you. The conservatives are on their second leader, all the other parties fe had their second leader, all the other parties 5 had all their second leader, all the other parties 2 had all had the mall r; ,,,,, not the labour party, leaders. Not the labour party, though, why not . Does it have a problem with women . It is embarrassing and troubling that we regard ourselves as the labour party being. Party for women and being the party for women and equality and many of us as feminists, thats why we joined the party because we saw at saw it at as that party. So never having had a female leader or woman prime female leader or womanPrime Minister, its very embarrassing and paradoxical minister, its very embarrassing and paradoxical
Montague. Of being a humourless feminisfi even her harman has been changed to Harriet Harperson to mock her politics. Shes the only woman who has come but even she ruled it out. Why . Was it the partys fault . Or hers . Harriet harman, welcome to hardtalk. Thank you. The conservatives are on their second leader, all the other parties fe had their second leader, all the other parties 5 had all their second leader, all the other parties 2 had all had the mall r; ,,,,, not the labour party, leaders. Not the labour party, though, why not . Does it have a problem with women . It is embarrassing and troubling that we regard ourselves as the labour party being. Party for women and being the party for women and equality and many of us as feminists, thats why we joined the party because we saw at saw it at as that party. So never having had a female leader or woman prime female leader or womanPrime Minister, its very embarrassing and paradoxical minister, its very embarrassing and paradoxical