capitol hill for a moment. to paul s point that there s nothing quite like the threat of criminal contempt to focus the mind, depending on whose mind we are talking about, mark meadows may not want that as the last item in his professional resume. whereas, a guy like steve bannon it is a resume burnisher to him. but let s talk about your contrary knowledge of the bannon case. does it just keep rolling along? well, you ve divined the difference between those individuals well. remember, when bannon was told that he was going to be held in criminal contempt or that he was going to be referred for it, it became an advertising marketing opportunity for him. he talked about the revenge he would have on democrats and how this moment would be foisted exactly upon them when republicans were back in control.
mine were talking about. mark meadows may not want that as the last item in his professional resume. whereas a guy like steve bannon gets a resume burnishing to him. but let s talk about your contemporary knowledge of the benin case. does it just keep rolling along? well you define the difference between those two individuals. remember when biden was told that he was going to be held in criminal contempt? or that he was going to be referred for it? it became an advertising marketing opportunity for him. he talked about the revenge he would have on democrats. and how this moment would be hoisted exactly upon them when republicans were back in control. it was almost like a fund raising letter for tongue wagging lobbyists. meadows situation is quite