moderates on the democratic side can come together or do you think that john podesta will be persuasive saying they have to scale it back. biden asked manchin for a top line number and manchin didn t give one. i m a little nervous about it. the segment open you said there is one step closer. there is a lot of negotiation that will have to take place. that s something we agree on. there is a lot of negotiation. a lot amount of money. dana: a high note of agreement. love seeing you. see you next friday. our border is still in crisis. i want to bring attention to the dereliction of duty by this president occurring at our southern border. can we stop pretending this adnistration deserves any benefit of the doubt? the biden administration engulfed in the crisis at the disaster of the southern border. why both sides of the political highly are coming down hard on
able to get this more moderate version through. let me put cold water on this in terms of expectations. even if they get that through in the house, then it s got to go to the senate. democrats are never going to agree to give the president full funding for his wall and so we re back at square one with the question of what are you going to do about this policy? and here you don t see anyone joining the democrats on the republican side. you see jeff flake, you see susan collins sending a letter to the adnistration, but you see none of them jumping on board with a solution to this very immediate problem that we have of these children being ripped away at the border and nothing in sight to address that. mike? this self-proclaimed policy of the trump administration, and it is of the trump administration, has been in force now for several weeks. it s been going on, children
i do think there will be resolution on this investigation, but russian influence is ongoing. it is still happening today. we saw more leaks from hackers tied to russia this week. there are threats of more to come. every time that happens, it further extends and keeps the investigation open. we will have resolution in the coming months. probably by summertime in the influence effort from last summer sgrch summer. tara, clint is saying it takes years to reap rewards from the seeds you sow. if there is a thread that s pull on and unweaves a tapestry in d.c. and the trump administration, what does it mean for the work this adnistration has put in place? i tnk there are two issues. one, the investigation is a distraction for the campaign when you look at russia hacking and collusion with the trump administration contacts and
published? there is not really a clear eaction yet tonight on this story. but if you sort of look back, to me this story feels like the latest in this kind of drip, drip, drip on possible russia collusion. as you point out, it may be the clearest evidence yet. there is very high bar to get a fisa warn. typically, if history is any indication what the administration will sort of say is there is no there there, it s a lot of smoke and not very much fire. but i have to say this story and i can assure you whatever story comes next and it feels like there will be some sort of story, does not help this adnistration with their general messaging narrative. they want to focus on their 100 days. their accomplishments or getting rid of the cloud of russia that dogged them since the campaign. ambassador, on russia, as we go to press tonight, the russians are dangling out, maybe
able to look at transcripts from conversations from the incoming adnistration, if that happened, chris, i don t know if that happened, but it s been reported in serious media outlets that that happened. the american people need to know exactly what was done here. there s a lot of open questions. that s why i m glad the investigation is going on. furthermore, what devin nunes did, you re going to get the answers to the information he who he talked to eventually in this process. he said he s not going to do that. he said he s not going to do that now, but the information is part of the investigation. obviously by the way, it has nothing to do with russia. that conversation in the white house had nothing to do with the russia investigation. it s about other surveil sglans the president said he was being wiretapped. at the edged of the day it is a ridiculous conspiracy theory. take it back to devin nunes, the concern a lot of people have, and this includes now a republican, i