roe is based on viability. the fetus able to leave outside the woman independently. in 1973, 21 to 24 weeks maybe. this 15 week mississippi law is getting pretty close as the technology improved for taking care of, you know, fetal health. so i believe that you have a very strong circumstance here with the conservatives are in a position to modify profoundly roe v. wade. i believe that that is the odds on destination where the court is headed right now, neil. neil: if they do line up action geraldo said to their philosophical bend, a 6-3 conservative court, it certainly was mirrored in a lot of the questioning from the justices. what did you learn from that? i was around for roe but i don t remember it.
thought the court should be neutral. he repeated that several times. that will be a surprise for a lot of court watchers to see kavanaugh cop out so openly against precedent and possibly against roe. neil: interesting. geraldo in listening to justice sotomayor on the viability of a fetus or lack of explanation, i m curious, geraldo, she was asking about the viability of the fetus and what is so special at that time, at that moment referring to the fact that with dead people, you can poke them on the foot or the hand and they would have a response but that didn t mean that they were alive. i don t quite know what she was getting at. the point being that there was nothing magical to that time or reading in to life at that time. what did you make of that? i think the court, neil, has struggled over the decades to find a line where the rights of the woman are now subordinate to