startling details. the devil is in the details. donald trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mar-a-lago. there could be numerous others that are charged, not just donald trump, as well as additional crimes that could be charged. is she kidding me? now, she might be getting that idea from one of the small parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted. like on page 30 where it referred to president trump and those around him as, quote, criminal parties. but still didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that releasing the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee or destroy evidence stored electronically or otherwise. flee? really? trump s plane has his name on it. and destroy electronic evidence. do they mean something like doing, i don t know, deleting 33,000 e-mails? we re going to get into that more in moments with our legal panel. but if anyone thinks that the doj is an impartial
You know, that seems especially rich considering the less complete eraser of the gender indifference to the small sliver of act shrifts bully their way to the front of the line. when the administration puts someone like rachel levine at hhs to promote so called gender affirming care to our kids it shouldn t come as a surprise children s hospitals are providing the sex change surgery. the founder of libs of tik toks was the first to expose children s national hospital in washington, dc for providing gender affirming, again, so-called, hysterectomies. yes, two children. how old is your patient? 16. okay. so they re in the clear. okay. so they would do it for that age? yes. okay. great. is it a common procedure that you guys do for that age? yes.