languages in the world, the vast majority of which get no safety systems from facebook. in october facebook came out against you, as you obviously know. they released a statement that said in part that you worked for the company for less than two years, had no direct report, never attended a decision point meeting with c level executives. were you at all surprised that they chose to try to attack you like that, dismiss you as a low level employee? the thing that facebook didn t disclose is what my relative seniority was in the company. by time i left i was more senior than 60 if not 70% of people, because in tech turnover is really fast. the second thing is i worked at four social media companies, all of which had algorithmic roles. i m one of the foremost experts in the industry with understanding the problems with ai systems in a social media context. it s true. i ve never been in a c suite meeting. but i also brought out an extensive cache of documents that demonstrates that fac
70% of people, because in tech, turnover is really fast. the second thing is i worked at four social media companies, all of which in algorithmic worlds. as a result, i m one of the foremost experts in the industry at understanding the problems with a.i. systems in a social media context. it s true, i have never been in a c-suite meeting, but i also brought out an extensive cache of documents that demonstrates that facebook has consistently lied about the safety options that exist, about its about the fact it s not doing everything it can to fight the problems, and they re not willing to sacrifice slivers of profit for our safety. you have said the company would be stronger if zuckerberg stepped down as ceo. if, a, do you think that s at all likely? and if you were the ceo of facebook, what is the first change you would make? on day one, what would your agenda be? you know, when i originally came forward, i really don t like personalizing conflicts. i think the problems at facebo