country back to the rest of the world in quality broadcasting, news and current affairs. isn t that kind of content likely to contain tony s subsidy and any future funding model we design? he subsidy and any future funding model we desian? , ., , , we design? he is absolutely right. when it these we design? he is absolutely right. when it these the we design? he is absolutely right. when it these the things - we design? he is absolutely right. when it these the things we - we design? he is absolutely right. when it these the things we don t| when it these the things we don t want is for all of our tv which is streamed in uk to come from overseas. the discussions we have about the future funding formula are going to have to include how we both protect, preserve, create great british contents. that has to be part of the debate moving forward. we haven t even big on the discussions yet. there are a number of ways that i have been told already that we could look at funding th
To them to? broadcasting a buy to them to? absolute question. i m not going to conflate channel 4 to the bbc. i m here to talk about this element of the licence fee but the second part of the question. settlement of the licence fee, but. and i. the second part of the question. but i didn t, there was no. she made an important point about the bbc world service. and we have, the bbc has, will be able to promote the billions of pounds and billions of funding, £23 billion, it s receiving, it will still be able to meet its mission and purposes. my my right honourable friend must be right that the bbc can t stand still while the rest of the world moves along, but will she accept that when we think about the future funding of the bbc we have to consider both the content that is marketable and which is going to be commercially successful and the content that is not but which will act as the beacon she describes, notjust to this