Barrel on fifth avenue outside of his offices. but it is curious because the bail application back when he was arrested said that they had tested that hair in two different independent laboratories and they had compared it to the dna from the pizza crust, and then in that bail application said that 99.96 of the north american population could be excluded as being from the same person, being from anyone but rex heuermann could be but excluded. but the judge seems to have set the perimeters. here is what is interesting. there was a case reported out of new york last year and the judge said according to new york law, once you get that dna, you could use it for any investigative purpose at the local level. that is what the defense has to be concerned about here. there are so many other victims that he has not charged with and they are looking at all of this. we know that.
Grabbed a leftover pizza crust and had it swabbed and analyzed by a forensic lab and prosecutors say it matched a dna from a male hair off bur lap recovered off the body of meghan. how strong is that evidence in your assessment, cc? that dna is different than is typically used in law enforcement case so this is unique, they are going to be using numbers that are very different than what we would normally hear in court. when they re working with their traditional profile, you will a hear numbers like there s a 1 in 230 trillion chance that this could be anyone else but with mitochondria dn a it s different. 99.96 of the north american population could be excluded and he could not be excluded. so this is a pretty use sneak
Suspicious internet search z as well. absolutely, it s psycho. will: he was, i think, searching, hey, why haven t they found this guy? he was searching something about the phone calls that he s now allege to have made to the victims, several different searches on the names of the victims. yes. he was looking up the victims, their families, and also you think about it, he was looking how can they catch the guy, the gilgo, through telephone records. there s been talk of that data being used. he looked it up, not to mention the terrible things about torture and things like that. will: you mentioned dna, that mitochondrial dna is certain to a 99.96% chance, so there s a lot as his attorney said, there s a lot of circumstrategy evidence, but once you get to the point of dna, it s pretty direct. yeah. and the jury s out there in suffolk county are smart, savvy people. they re going to get the dna evidence. i think they ll get a connection if not a plea.
Eventually lead to dna you would describe as how rock solid that you got the right guy. well i think if you look at all of the evidence and how it comes together, i think it s very solid, and you know it starts with the activity but that s underneath victims. what fascinates me is the arrival, the path to get to the dna evidence, from what i understand the mitochondrial match from discarded pizza to a hair left on a body is 99.96% accurate but to get to the place where you re testing rex huberman s pizza where did it to pool the suspects? at the beginning we have the hairs but we didn t have anything to compare them to so that s where the work started. it starts with the phones, and we could tell from analysis that
Charge, stephanie. he did this in concert with other people, and who are they? and the conspiracy part of this means they had to know what they were doing was a crime. you can t accidently conspire. you can t just go i would no idea, i just moved some boxes, i had no idea. when you see a conspiracy charge, people knew what they were doing. and who was the one directing them? most likely donald j. trump. anthony, what s the department of justice s conviction rate in this kind of case? 99.96%. it s pretty high. let me think if i can about where frank left off. the key to understanding merrick garland s justice department is is understanding his absolute devotion to the rule of law. and that for him, that phrase is not just some lawyer s turn of a