in the process, giving the parties some very real weapons to carry into midterm elections. now, just barely three months away. starting with senate democrats rallying around a major spending package aimed at reducing record consumer inflation. but also a massive investment in health care and climate interventions. central to the biden agenda. and now, on the cusp of receiving this weekend, after previous hold, arizona senator kristen sinema announced her support for the bill. giving senate democrats the votes they need to pass it by monday morning. and another shot in the arm heading into november, that is on the top of a surprising strong july jobs report that just more than doubled economists expectations. one of the main architects of the september 11th attacks, and a major vote in favor of abortion rights coming from the deep red state. all in the last week. but is it enough for the democrats in either chamber to keep the majorities in three months? i will ask the chair o
that s what the prosecutors will get him maybe in front of the grand jury. perhaps an fbi interview. we re not quite at this time. but as you mentioned, with that target letter going out to former president trump, it could come at any minute. that s typically the next step. in the classified documents case, the judge in this case, aileen cannon settle the date for may 20, 2024. assuming thait happens on that date, and of course, it could slip, that will be in the thick, actually, sort of after the presidential republican primary elections have wrapped up. trump could have this thing wrapped up, the primary process before this trial even starts. he could. he may be the presumptive nominee by the time this trial kicks off. if the trial schedule, it won t get earlier. it might go later. yeah. if it holds, he might be the presumptive nominee. at that point in time in 2016,
constitutional. other vice presidential. but those are all known. what is left to investigate? is jack smith just gonna come to the doj and pick up the file folder. and pump through it himself? or is there even any independent investigation let s to be done on the either of these issues? so, in terms of simply spending resources, i really wonder at the necessity of appointing a special counsel to investigate something that, everyone has already investigated and appears to know everything there is to be known about it. let s go old-school law school you and i right now, and i m in a push back and say to you danny, the following, you re not gonna bring in jack smith just a turn around and declined prosecution,, it gives him cover to merrick garland who is a true institutional especially because of the announcement on tuesday that trump is now officially running for president of the united states, again, in 2024. assuming argue window as we ve
the way in first on former president trump s continued hold on the republican hearty. who can candidates continue to win primaries, trump endorses this week scored victories and key states including arizona, and michigan. but many of those candidates will face a more difficult rule in the general election. and even trump supporters tell pollsters, they aren t sure they want him to run again in 2024. assuming legal problems don t catch up with him before that, given all that, is trump still the standard bearer of the party, daniel? well after this week, it would be impossible to say that anybody but trump is the standard bearer for the party. we see a power game in washington. is he winning with this endorsements, is he not winning with his endorsements? i think that the crucial thing that we need to understand is that regardless of where trump
assuming he can t or won t, kamala harris? pete buttigieg? they are in a real odd situation of who is the inheritor of the democratic party should joe biden not be able to run? well, it might as well be bernie sanders. it s his ideology that s running the democrat party. and a close second is a elizabeth warren. so i guess it s a sanders-warren ticket. even if they re not the actual names on it, it s their ideologies that are driving and directing the new far left democrat party. jfk couldn t be a democrat today. he was pro-life. he was pro-defense. he was anti-communist. he was a guy that believed in slashing taxes and freeing up business. he wouldn t recognize the party that he was a part of in 1960. i mean, i think we just have to look at the fact that the democrats have essentially given themselves over to the most radical people in the country. not the most radical in the democrat party. the most radical people in the