of the case before a grand jury. they were largely contemplating what was going to come after that, how many people were going to copycat the steve bannon approach. i would assume their contemplative state of mind is going to expedite the future discussions including one right now. but oddly enough, steve bannon, of course, and mark meadows are in very different positions. steve bannon never having been part of the administration since 2017. counter that to mark meadows, chief of staff, for the president of the united states. mark meadows had a much stronger, more valid claim about the assertion of privilege. the trick here though is he s already provided documents when it comes to content that has nothing to do with executive privilege. and for that too he has refused to actually abide by and comply with the subpoena. so he s made a more difficult case for himself to be able to say that the privilege will attach to everything, and he s made it easier case for the department of justice