compromise. they re making the best argument they re totally irresponsible and it s insanity to give them a veto power of a party that s legitimately trying to govern when they don t have a plan for governance and their idea is crash the economy, crash the democracy and say no to everything. i think if democrats can finally get mr. mansion to acknowledge that he is not dealing with the 1950s version of the republican party or even the 1990lican par dealing with people on a mission to destroy america, maybe that would finally make an impact on him when they re talking about getting rid of the filibuster. they are simply trying to, as you say, own the libs and they take the country down the tube, oh, well, that s the cost of doing business. i ll make you a finer point of it, jason. i ll correct myself. it isn t one party governing. it is one part of the government that means the house of