some candor, it looks like he s at least providing testimony that will be likely to be damaging to donald trump. what is he saying in the january 6th case? it is like the 64 million dollar question all over d.c. and you get so much further for an understanding on the documents side. i m dying to bring glen and david into this conversation. we ll have much more on jack smith s other investigation into donald trump and all the questions that john is describing are still swirling on what exactly meadows role is in that investigation. and an argument getting traction on the left and right that the republican presidential front-runner, the four-times indictmented ex-president himself should be disqualified for running for president at all because of his role in the
who will target. and when they ll come. she said there imminent, but she s also clarified, she said that s legally imminent, not reporter journalistically eminent. so, we re not exactly sure where reporters were meeting on the tenterhooks for the news any moment now. for her, legally, it might mean a couple more weeks. i m often reminded there is a difference in those timelines. carol, is it likely that what we heard about perjury has to do with some of trump s allies? well, i think it s a 64 million dollar question. and on the other hand, it has to be. because the centerpiece of this probe has been, forgive me, fani s probe, has been what were the reasons? what was involved? and trump increasingly, desperately, trying to pull these levers of power over state electors, state
she said there imminent, but she s also clarified, she said that s legally imminent, not reporter journalistically eminent. so, we re not exactly sure where reporters were meeting on the tenterhooks for the news any moment now. for her, legally, it might mean a couple more weeks. i m often reminded there is a difference in those timelines. carol, is it likely that what we heard about perjury has to do with some of trump s allies? well, i think it s a 64 million dollar question. and on the other hand, it has to be. because the centerpiece of this probe has been, forgive me, fani s probe, has been what were the reasons? what was involved? and trump increasingly, desperately, trying to pull these levers of power over state electors, state legislatures, to try to claim there was fraud when many of
glenn enough, i want to apologize in advance, not a lot of time for either of, you because this is carols nights. tell us more about your reporting. why on earth, with the inspector general, the, watchdog scrapped the plans to recover the texts? why? you know, stephanie, that is the 64, 000, 64 million dollar question. in fact, investigator that i spoke with yesterday, and this, morning said to me when i asked, what is the significance in your mind about these records, these devices being offered by certain federal agency officials and inspector general, the government watchdog, saying, no, never mind, we are not gonna take those? the investigators said, what investigated doesn t take evidence that is brought into them and offered? and that s one of the dhs
winning investigative reporter. jeff mason correspondent for reuters, and former prosecutor glenn kirschner, he has had murder trials, organized crime, and [inaudible] cases. glenn enough, i want to apologize in advance, not a lot of time for either of, you because this is carols nights. tell us more about your reporting. why on earth, with the inspector general, the, watchdog scrapped the plans to recover the texts? why? you know, stephanie, that is the 64, 000, 64 million dollar question. in fact, investigator that i spoke with yesterday, and this, morning said to me when i asked, what is the significance in your mind about these records, these devices being offered by certain federal agency officials and inspector general, the government watchdog, saying,