Settled on. well, i only need 11,750 votes and that is not taken n in context what that call waots about. so my question to you is, you know, what did he do here? or is this an example that you you might have a legal theory, maybe it s deemed controversial? is it a legitimate theoreoryy, especially in light of, you know, let s sa of y what happened in 1960 with john kennedy in hawaii and alternate electors haw chosen? i think this is criminalizing the challenging of elections. basically, you have a democratic prosecutor saying, how dare challenge a democratich victory? well, it s been done beforallene by democrats. and the whole case is based on this theory that donald trump really didn t mean it. well , neither did, though. even if that were true and,fw you know, as democrats, they challenged trump s trump election on no grounds at all. o i meann no, many of these past l challenges were very, very
Only need 11,750 votes. that s not what that call was about. what did he do here or is this an example you might have a legal theory, is it a legitimate theory in light of what happened in 1960 with john kennedy in hawaii and alternate electorals chosen? this is crimmalizing the challenge of elections. you have a democrat prosecutor saying how dare you challenge a democratic victory? it s been done before by democrats. the case is based on the theory that donald trump dependent need it even if that was true, the democrats challenged trump s election on no grounds. many of the past challenges were very, very thin. in donald trump s case, he