Live Breaking News & Updates on அரசு க்கு நீதிமன்றம் ஓவர் காலநிலை

It is, of course, a brave and important thing to do. As I have written here before, the act of removing fossil fuels from the ground is a key step in the process that leads to them being burned, and greenhouse gas emissions being released. It is, broadly in Australian culture, politics and media, treated as if it a wholly neutral act – a passive facilitation between supply and demand. “They’d simply get their coal elsewhere if we didn’t do it”, is the primary catch-cry.
The ‘drug dealer’s defence’ pretends there is only a one-way relationship between supply and demand. But, of course, plentiful supply leads to lower costs, which increases consumption of the product. In this case, coal is the primary driver of the greatest threat ever faced by our species, and a direct threat to the lived experiences of these teenagers. ....

United Kingdom General , United Kingdom , Matthew Rimmer Drrimmer , Anjali Sharma , Scott Morrison , Wales Vickery , Boris Johnson , Paul Flynn , Government To Court Over Climate , Minerals Council Of Australia , Australia Renewable Energy , International Energy Agency , Planning Commission , World Coal Association , New South Wales Vickery , These Teens , Matthew Rimmer , New South , Independent Planning , Environmental Impact Statement , Renewable Energy Target , Minerals Council , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் ஜநரல் , ஒன்றுபட்டது கிஂக்டம் , அஞ்சலி ஷர்மா , ஸ்காட் மோரிசன் ,