Appear on the march first board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated okay. Thank you madam clerk item one. Item one motions ord the voters for the ordinance for the amendment of the business and Administrative Co Administrative Code for one percent tax on the occupancy hotel rooms and services to and fami end family homelessness on an election on june 13th. Ill taken treason motion first anyone wish to comment on item one. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues do i have a motion to file item number one. So moved. By supervisor tang and well take that without objection. Madam clerk call item 2 please. Item 2 is a resolution 30 years the sfmta to execute and industrial Lease Agreement with the Industrial Park for a space on the avenue for sfmta bus operator training courses estimated from october 2016 and a to 200026. Mta is here to speak on this item. Good morning in the yesterday, i have an opportunity some twentyfour hours ago to appear about you since that 2000 of communications between our control center and operators on the street and the communications have deadlielt w Customer Relations and safety and security our operators if not the most important job category certainly the most visible we want to talk the critical need for a dedicated Training Facility for certainly one of the Core Communications in thfunctions in all of our Business Safety first but you may recall over the last couple of years weve been on a steady improvement course for the on time preferences with tperforms with the reinstated is up with your help and support but more than that moone of the things weve been able to do is master blo playoff the prop m goal to have high quality training weve been able to invest in over the last several years but allows us to provide reliable and Safety Services but for 4 Service Increases in the last 2 and a half years how did he, we even though again, he with looked at the way were training the investment we had been macro in training is a critical function of the service and fall we need to right size the staff we needed to look at the facilities, the program and we did all of that looked at the graduation and the curriculum and the result was we were able to process a Record Number of people through the system and the results that we are shown right here and again, i mentioned the improvements and on time performance improvements in Service Delivery and all of these are coming over the laced two years weve been able to have a stable and could not have pipeline some 2 thousand operators in the system we sp t expect that to grow with the additional Service Increases but allows us to meet the citys goal of the expanding transit and increasing the mode share for transit and alternatives other than driving at the same time, we remain vulnerable and class general run thirty to 40 people but the training folks have had to work hard to constantly search for locations the training is 44 days along for a new bus operator and most of the time should be spent behind the wheel looking for a site to be able to do that is difficult wenve had no leads ad particular land and hand in hand from place to place over a long time and when you keep in mind the exceptions for the safety and the fact we carry from a ridership prospective more riders than any other two systems put together remain the only operational bus provider not whith a Training Facility that allows us to continue the improvements that we made because if were not able to find a place if we call on the good graze of onsite others if we cant deliver well be below our Services Goals i guess over 3 mayoral mifksdz we have been looking for a place this search started when willie brown, jr. Was starting his second term and continues her heres a quick overview of the places weve used and i dont think any of the building the real estate the blaay area but e near bay area is more inviting for looking for a facility of this type of and this nature so the point im trying to make weve been nomads for the last 19 years weve been on a method california safe haven that continues to this day only this time we think we found the right place certainly meets all our needs from allowing us to hit our service goal and give us the room we need to conduct the proper training and the location is such that it has easy assess on and off and people will be able to get there the terms of lease as note in the bnudget Analyst Report eave talked about that what is important from our stand point this is the cost of that operation well be the operating budget were prepared to do e deal with that core need for the system and making the accommodations to get this facility it will pay defenders never mind of making the Service Objectives avenue 15 years of searching we think weve found a solution that allows us to keep our goals going it is difficult sometimes to comme come before a body and say there isnt a lot of good alternatives but in this particular cased frankly there isnt i mentioned we continue to look at the conditions the releasial estate market and the supply knono one expecting it endeavor to increase the industrial location at thirty tampa ran is beli belowmarketrate in San Francisco so in that respect weve worked with the developer to get a very badly we on a fair deal and in that regard but frankly the alternative to continue to reflex missing a training class, missing the ability to improve and inclusive on our service and meet the goals weve set again, the alternative the only real alternative will, maintain the status quo that again for the heaviest traveled agency in the region to have to depend on the good graze of others to control our own destiny is where we dont want to be it jeopardizes the services and safety improvements weve made with that, were recommending as strong as we can say approval the resolution we believe 2 will insure the improvement in the safety and allows us into the future because we may talk ive been tremendous supporter collectively of our acquisition of new vehicles and technologies as we move to the electrical vehicle ive not heard anyone talking about the drivers bus but if the Technology Becomes available well always need drivers even the most highly Sophisticated Technology relies on humans to monitor and manage the technology this is a critical need for us what i will argue the most important job cartegory the fac of agent and the city the first people that literally are casing precious cargo we entrust the lives of over seven hundred trips a day to the operators and need to give them the training to deliver the services so i thank you for that and were im available to answer any questions. Thank you, mr. Halley supervisor tang. Thank you suvery much for your presentation i was one of the annoying supervisors that asked you how it was going with our operator training i appreciate the agency trying to train as many operators as possible that serves all the customers in muni i have some scott wieners questions about this new arrangement i appreciated your summon of the sites youve analyzed previously that was one basic question i had for you given the location so you know with this new lease arrangement obviously as harvey will be pointing out in his report it is a significant jump in terms of the amount well pay in terms of relent hardwacharge what youre paying it is one and 45 thousand dollars a year a significant increase and you know can you tell me a little bit how once we have the site youve said will provide more certainty nevertheless ain term of the training how that might help with getting more operators out the door into the street from work 44 cases for the operator to go through the training will this insure it sticks to the 44 days right now be you seeing delays in getting people out the door. Certainly first of all, just so far a point of clarification the one and 55 thousand dollars is reference is not granted it simply licenses and fees we pay on the places we have a point of clarification but having this permanent will facilities allows us to one of the things weve been able to do over the years as we are able to provide the planning staff and the resources even with Service Increases we determine the number of operator for example, every month 1 operators will retire or attrition and in addition, we add for service we need more operator this allows us to make sure that we dont have peaks and valleys so as we go through our process and add service and improve our reliability because you mean we go through a period we miss if he went through 909 percent of the service to drop pulling out now and say down to 97 it creates gaps because of schedules so that thin this particular case it lets the please be advised that the chair may order the removal from the meeting room planning folks we need this many operators ray train and one of the things to remember in addition to a problem ive talked about all the things an operator needs to do to customer ambassador be able to respond to safety calls and security calls one of the other things they have to do through all interethis interpre navigation e navigate 65 though ton pound vehicle through a densely crowded city to understand houw the vehicle wors and feels and then how to turn it is very difficult if you look at one of the 60 foot buses you dont turn it hike an automobile it has a different dimensiynami having the facility that loallo the training to coach and teach those kinds of bus movement is very important that will not only give the operator more selfconfidence and stikill but also will make them better prepared the more driving time the better i dont expect well look to cut the 44 days just the opposite to have a facility and that is available when we have someone that is out there if they have a problem a in a particular location can bring them back into for training and also, because our operators have San Francisco meet frederal and state standards for more training that allows us to this situation it is unpredictable and you call a site and take 10 operators out of one division you miss the services having our own facility well meet the Service Needs but at the same time our operators are providing the training and met all the regulatory requirement. Can you automobitalk about plans or mtas plans for expanding the training i know were getting more buses and trains, new i mean, hopefully for operator so, i mean is that site okay to accommodate more operators. Well in this particular case it is and the training burden over the next few years were in the midst of it were about to start on the l l v as the new l l r v at the end of the fall of this year we start with that but with all the new buses one of the things were doing again with our constant help and so forth renewing the fleet and the new hybrid technology the bus operates different more sensors and electronics and diagnostics on the dashed that tell the operator what to do sometimes the disadvantaged of september sources and electronics you can shut the bus down so that requires additional trouble shooting training you want to maximize the time the trainers with with the operators hands on in moving the vehicles you can learn a description the classroom this is practice stuff we move to the real world soon and the training folks want to insure that the operators are best prepared so as you have bring in new vehicles is it so constant you you know combrupt and upgrading based on the training in all t vehicles. Okay so you know again, i understand the benefits of having more certainty over the site and a larger facility will as well longer than term balances 9 and a half years one thing eave learned the city of south San Francisco has a Development Agreement with the owner of the facility even though mta has the ability to purchase this site have had the opportunity it Development Agreement does exist and not guarantee youll continue your Training Facility there so, in fact, the preferred use i believe there is office space can you talk about that and its been tough and long but at the same time, were investing a lot money down the road in the and a half or 10 years we may not be able to stay here and do training there. Well, i think it is solves what it does if you in answer to our question looking at from is Service Prospective the decade of certainty, if you will, the site meets all our objectives for training over the next decade and at the same time, we will continue to explore any other viable alternatives should they become available it is not we would stop looking but work with the developer and the reality folks to work on the best arrangement and also gives us time to evaluate you know all of the potentially other sites for what we might do in concert with the owner in improving the situation whether financing on terms there but really for us it give us a consistent because of the operation for the next decade and allows us to continue the improvements and meet the Service Needs they will be expanding i think we talked yesterday about the consultant strategy and even though need to address Additional Service to meet our collective policy goals we think that while appreciate the concern there we think this gives us a 10 years at least or approximately 10 years certainty the continuous of the way we are which is operation from a Service Prospective very higher risk everything were accomplished the last couple of years is vulnerable if we are innovate successful in getting access to a facility well have to cancel or limit the training 9 pipeline is uneven and dont have hard to set schedules that are the redoll effects will be shown on the street with less buses showing up or buses not showing up when their supposed to be buses more crowded. So i would encourage the agency while youre in this space to continue luke for more stable alternatives beyond the decade i know that supervisor yee has a question ill let him ask. Supervisor yee. I guess anythimy line of questioning is the same as supervisor tang some porart of your presentatio almost im sorry. The front part of your presentation of seeing what youve been doing oand successfl this training and so forth almost is argument to continue that effort. The question i have for current trainings is that have you actually missed any trainings programs the last few years . Im sorry, i didnt hear the question. Youve had a set of trainings the last 44 days each have you the last few yrlgz years missed any sets of trainings because you didnt have anywhere to train the people. Actually yes it is we both missed and had to reschedule and reduce the class size in order to accommodate not having proper facilities when i say i will stress with the vulnerability of all the improvement weve made again, when you look at our needs 2009 operators we know where a certain number are going on with attrition and others need recertification it ben restraining order benefiting us to lay out a schedule and the training folks can staff up class sizes but with the changes and the improvement that the folks having made were vulnerable if we dont cannot get a facility to give the operator trainees the time behind the wheel we have had to postpone classes and reduce the class size what that means again had you dont have oaenough operators in the pipeline you miss service and thats in fact, what happened what were trying to do both continue and improve the Quality Services and make sure we have the proper planning tools in place to make sure we dont do it the future but, yes had to make compromises because of the situations. What percentage this you know last year what percent of the drivers that would have been trained werent trained . What percentage im sorry again. Youre saying there is times you missed trainings and couldnt you had to reduce the size and now your falling behind in at number of drivers you need how far have you fallen behind and ill be happy to to send you a followup letter to cancel classes and drop down. You stated that i was asking about the numbers. Well provide you those numbers. You dont have an idea of you know sort of a general idea. Yeah. If a typical pagers and similar soundproducing Electronic Devices are prohibited at this meeting. Class of new Bus Operators is two thirty and 40 you would depending on the staffing level if you have the facilities youll want to be on the highend especially, as you there are no go through so at least i can think of two occasions the last two years the classes were having to be cancelled another one to make adjustment at the last minute that caused us to pay people over time to miss runs all kinds of redoll effects class that dont go through the pipeline 80 people and others that are less than desirable and if you look at what is take place with the service you see weve gone from missing 67 to 6 percent of the service under a fraction of one percent the numbers when you look at 17 to 8 hundred active operators those are the numbers. What im trying to get at i have to find the justification why we are spending over 10 years and trillions of dollars for Training Facilities and it would have been a good presentation you if brought those numbers with you so is hey look were missing those many drivers and have to pay over time so we have justification because youre saying at training model is a good model and the drivers are welltrained and so forth so it feels like why change it then. I understand. 20 million. I understand the question ill go book to 18 months ago we were missing 6 percent of the service not enough operators and the ability to train them we hired extra training and the process to get us here is taken longer than than we like right now, were providing the highest percentage of scheduled service on the street this agency ever has so in terms of how many drivers and how many have been trained it is weve been able to do that but had to scramble over a longer are period of time and we would have machibeen more co effective to have a facility and the ability to plan and to deliver in a more streamlined fashion. Okay. I guess that is sort of the point if you could give cost analysis then it it t that would be helpful to support this particular item. When you say cost analysis if you would, sir clarify what it say you would like. If you in our statement you said much more costefficient to have this new site so wheres the analysis for that. Okay. Well, well ill be happy to to that about ybut a cost analysis will demonstrate something from the Controllers Office about the cost to the city, the cost to the economy of us not having delivering our services or having delays and bunches and gaps so well provide you with a cost of what the lost of service is. Yeah. Im not ready to vote on this unless you two want to do this i want to see your analysis okay. Okay. Tell you what mr. Rose, can we go to your report. And have Public Comment left to go. Im sorry. Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the Committee First of all, let me make a general comment the Budget Analyst Office is totally supportive of a high quality Training Facility for the sfmta and we totally concur with the developme concept of a consolidated Training Facility but ill note that the statement that the comments that supervisor tang pointed out about what happens after 9 and a half years is extremely important in my judgment in our consideration of this item on page 3 of our report we state in order to complete lease holder improvements on the subject hand for hand property the owner and the city of San Francisco south San Francisco negotiated an agreement that allows the sfmta entertainers on the property through february the 28 of 2016 thats the end date of this proposed Lease Agreement youre asked to approve if if the Development Agreement is sustained i say if sfmta would have the option to extend the firemterm the leases under same terms and conditions based on the length of the extension, however, the proposed sfmta bus operator trainees is not consistent with the long term to provide officers at this site within walking distance of both the board of trustees bart and the bart station on page 5 of the report we note in table two on page 2 of the report over the 9 year 5 month lease the sfmta will extend 29 million plus to rent and operate and maintain this new bus paraded trained facility as supervisor yee as piloted and supervisor tang sfmta is currently spending approximately, one and 55 thousand dollars unanimously for short time licenses for off street facilities during the first year of the proposed lease the sfmta will pay 2 million 4 hundred and 80 thousand three hundred plus in rent that is over one thousand nine hundred percent more than the one and 55 thousand that the sfmta currently acceptance for bus paraded facility about one and 50 percent one thousand 5 hundred percent slightly in excess of that the estimated over the wall appraised value of this property is 28 million plus as shown in table 2 if the sfmta rents the property for the proposed 9 year 5 month lease the sfmta will pay the owner total rent of 25 million plus over that term which is only 3 million plus less than than the 28. 8 appraised value including the improvements, however, in fairness the sfmta the owner is not willing to sell the property again open page 4 if the sfmta compressors the option to purchase at the earliest date after year six the sfmta would potential pay on estimated total rent of 15 million plus for year 6 the lease and then an additional estimated price to purchase based on the current appraisal over and over a total of 44 million plus however, the Purchase Price is hopefully to be significantly higher than that as it will be based on an appraisal of the best use of the property and completed 6 years later on page 6 of our report if the board of supervisors approves the proposed lease at sfmta will spend approximately 25 million over 9 years plus at the end of that period the city of south San Francisco doesnt extend the agreement with the owner to allow a bus operator facility only this site the sfmta will find itself the exact same situation as currently with the livelihood there will be fewer lease and purchase options and similarly the sfmta 90 does in the purchase this site the sfmta would extend a minimum of 44. 5 million including rental costs and the costs to purchase the property with no absolutely no sdpeguarantees the sooilt si can be used as as long term bus operator Training Facility because the city of San Francisco may require a different use for the property we recommend i amend the proposed resolution for a lease term this is just to make it correct lease term of 9 years and 5 months as stated instead of 9 years and six months for the reasons ive just sat down and consider approval the proposed resolution and mainstreamed a amended to be a policy resolution for the board of supervisors. Thank you, supervisor. I would like to continue this item for a week to get Additional Information from mta. Okay so lets take Public Comment right now first ill say anyone wish to comment on item 2 . On item number 2. Other members if you want to come up you have 2 minutes. My name is silvia johnson. And ive been very sick i hope we can review this transportation for the mission and training process and our but our drivers and parking areas spaces thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Good morning board of supervisors eric for the local 248 i know john has been put in a position to answer a lot of questions you yourselves ahave been on th board for quite a bit this agency is so far behind the curve when it comes to transportation issues and the things that the Transportation Agency cso have done done for years our sistbrothers and sist across the bay have their own facilities it is needed it is needed for your employees and the workers within 9 sfmta these facilities provide a mountain of need you figure when training buses go out on the streets it immediately effects service immediately because now have you have training l r v if so closing the services and bus zones crowded and so forth we have to get on board the city has to invest everybody is talking about muni needs to be on time and muni needs to do this you approved the training for the new trains you guys did now ill ask you look at other facilities in which a theirs having all those everything late and even their own buses new york and ac Transit Services any Profession Police and fire everyone goes through retraining you want us to be professional and curve our siaccidents we ne the consistent trainings and you come to the Training Facility in disrespect to anyone this is a joke this is a joke you have to see what theyre working with right now. Thank you very much is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this item 2. Yes. Hi, good morning im james im Senior Vice President with the real estate we have been losing over the last 5 years ive been in the business thirty years ive not seen 9 market this tight formal industrial type of properties two relevance sails as you may know the San Francisco chronicle Printing Press on marin 1901 cesar chavez a 17 point plus acre site that was paid 94 square feet for a building going to be torn down the other parcel the park a 13 plus acre site that workout to 85 per the land you dont have any other spaces within the city and county of San Francisco you looked at this parcel two years ago and it is the only viable parcel we could find in the meadow bay area that will work for funnimuni they waa four basically 4 Training Facility under one area of the 7 plus acres that works there the issue we have a sdmish resource were seeing humble development in san leandro with the Industrial Properties disappearing and nothing left here i think anything we look at will be more competitiexpensive one of the reasons a auto return is outside of the city and quickly south city Development Agreement they created a similar situation when golden gate brand e pi beverages left San Francisco on south maple that site. Thank you, sir appreciate that. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this item anyone line up. A developer of the site here about two years ago mta and james said why are you here we cant find anything in San Francisco i said why not you have Treasure Island and such the candle stick area he said nothing evacuating available this is a unusual site 67 plus acres not a single thing left in sight we started negotiating that took two years were able a custom facility for sfmta we have to tear down one and 50 square feet of warehouses i note the appraisal was 28 million that is not correct if we remodel the warehouses it worst a lot more but we have letters of intent to a long term lease of 9 and a half years i feel at this point we can extend that lease that is one of the questions that supervisor tang asked the reason we come up u came up with the 9 and a half or 10 years the new plan by city of San Francisco they changed the staff and a grand idea in the middle of an Industrial Area but theres no facility there to no the traffic situation theres no way from 10 avenue to get into where the sigte is the have to create a new road wiit will never happen it is last week the mayor said in south San Francisco ive been hearing about this for 20 years it will never happen we need to go back if this lease is approved and get this done this is the time to during the 10 years this only is pie in the sky thank you im available to answer any questions. Thank you very much. Is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this item 2 seeing none, Public Comment is closed ill say from my prospective i think there are a lot of questions raised about this although i see the value in what were doing i appreciated the public testimony from the drivers prospective and the reality prospective having said that, i think that good policy to support the community but needs more information ill be happy to support that motion and yeah hopefully get that information you need supervisor yee to have a vote next week. Supervisor tang. Thank you and also i too really appreciate the comments made during Public Comment i certainly understand the value of good training and retraining of the operators wear ouch on the side of lademanding more of you to have service out of difference to my colleague and needing more information ill support a continuance and hopefully, well sort it all out it looks like harvey. Sorry supervisor rose. Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee based any understanding of supervisor yees request it will take as you i think a little bit of time for the sfmta to respond but definitely a little bit of time to analyze what they submit we want to make sure that supervisor yees is provided with the information hes requested if i scotland to continue to two weeks ill greatly appreciate that mr. Chairman. I see mr. Haley in terms of getting the information you need but putting that together for supervisor yee. Certainly provide the information certainly between the what can w week. Beamed for example, if it was voted next we have to get a report out tomorrow ill urge the sfmta the committee to continue it for two weeks so we can provide our information to the supervisor and okay. Thank you. Presenter it. How about a motion to continue this for two weeks. Motion by supervisor yee well take that without objection. Okay thanks everyone ambassador madam clerk item 3. Consideration the research for the funded to the Police Department placed on budget and finance reserve the annual appropriation original for 2015 to 2017 in the amount of 2 point plus Million Dollars for the Body Worn Camera program. Supervisor farrell and members of the committee katherine cfo of the Police Department were in complete agreement with the budget Analyst Report im available to answer any questions. Thank you, very much colleagues are you on the roster ok okay. Colleagues, any questions okay mr. Budget analyst your report please. Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee on page 9 the department has provided a 20152016 budget of 2 million plus for the Body Worn Camera program in table one on page 9 we recommend you approve the 2 point plus Million Dollar the budget and finance committee reserve and supervisor tang one of the things that i would like you know maybe we can discuss this during the Budget Hearing the rp process is not complete im hoping once it is completed well learn at details what it is that the vendor will be doing and so forth we can profoundly do that and take it into the committee but i thikno that along with this i believe the departme is hire about 11 p and youve hired 9 out of 11 positions and 9 are legal assistant can you describe a little bit what that entails and the others are it staff yet to be heard. Thats correct the two the 9 local positions will be working on insuring that the policy regarding retention and holding on to video is maintained so matt haneaning were in comp with our own policy theyll be dealing information requests and doing the work of redacting videos as predicament appropriate to respond to requests from daze to make sure the videos are available for court preertsdz aiming thats the bulk of what their doing. So theyll be doing it versus a vendor for the most part and it staff we can forget their need in terms of the ongoing maintains maintenance i know that was pointed out one hundred thousand dollars but probably other aim plaintiff attorney wanting to mr. And mrpe report well be talking about that 24 every year but pencil that. The maintenance and support line that is readilly focus on e things that are needed to sustain the Access Management process setting up information one time sergeant savings account set working up the firewall thing but in addition there is the Maintenance Support line is support for the Body Worn Camera unit well be doing all the public records request and information for court and then in addition to that really where the cost that you might be concerned with the the out years with the contract and storage so but really you know the Legal Assistance will insure that the records are maintained and video that may not be necessarily maintained thats where the costs are mitigated a little bit. Okay. He know this that obviously comes at a handwriting conversation around the cameras that the city developed around that in terms of just the financial aspect of these purchase or going with the vender i think that it is something i feel comfortable with supporting. Okay thank you supervisor tang one comment weve got comments from the r v progress can you comment from the Police Department prospective. The Police Department participated the rfp process as experts the office of Contract Administration ran those as the body the city that runs procurement processes and so you know if their questions about subject matter we have my colleagues here available to answer any questions surrendering that and oca is available outside the hearings to answer questions and okay. Ive contract them as well appreciate that. Okay. Thank you very much colleagues if not other questions move on to Public Comment is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this item line up and well do one at that time, and everyone has two minutes. Good morning well, i didnt prepare a speech as usual but u usual but this is all i have to say about the San Francisco Police Department remember how big you are there is someone bigger you make sure that the Police Department is prepared to have the equipment they need without them there would be no civilization at the beginning of man okay civilization began with someone looking for a group of smoall people all times more thdern sts fine but make sure that the Police Department has Body Worn Cameras to protect San Francisco make sure that is the budget thats all i have to say im i was the navy and go police thats all i have to say thank you, gentlemen go police thank you. Good afternoon my name is ted District Attorneys Office im the president of the utilized and were one of the companies that responded to the rfp id like to raise questions about the budget in front of i 2. 4 million with your asking to release one of the concern is on video action theyve hired 9 of 11 employees to be part of the job theyll have to do id like to point out that if you put out a press release release on San Francisco and the pitfalls and considering the true costs of action Tasers International it the product youre approving the 2. 4 million for and in a report they put out a 2016 tasers Law Enforcement Technology Report they addressed the action that was an estimate done by a very credible Law Enforcement agency called the washington, d. C. Metro police did a pilot with taylors and collected a certain amount of data they did apples to apples an analysis to redact the video that poliilot would have taken million hours to redact and if you take one million hours and divide it for hiring many years a one and 50 man years worth of effort ill suggest that you know we provide information and there is more budget analyst to determine whether or not the true costs are they ten times that amount thank you. Thank you. Next speaker, please. Hello my name is silvia johnson. Ive been you know looking on this issue that is forgivgives diverse for the Police Department i see a lot of things that are done behind our backs not done by the one that had values of history it was only done because of situations with with that were denied i think that we when we have no purchpo open th on this i think we have our analysis where papers that have been stole from me that had you know injured the Police Department ive not going to take any of this take back you know for the United States of america because we have you know means with the Police Department and Community Services and that this process is not going to keep on going on behind the back remember and killing we have already too much of that governmental impossible impossible overwhelms to make sureovernmental impossible impossible overwhelms to make suremental impossible impossible overwhelms to make sual impossible impossible overwhelms to make surel impossible impossible overwhelms to make su impossible impossible overwhelms to make sure impossible impossible overwhelms to make sure that thank yit is not right to make the world worse and no damage for if are Police Department the technology the walls ive put on there makes more sense. Thank you very much is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this item okay seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues, any further discussion . Comments nope through the chair i think ill like to make a motion to release the 2. 7 million storm 4 million. We have a motion by supervisor katie tang ill say i appreciate some of the comments ive talked to the cia and interacted with the Police Department and feel comfortable of the process they ran i understand during any rfps that are people that are unhappy with the resolve he appreciate that there will be another light and place but at this time im prepared to support this we need to get going as soon as possible supervisor tang well take that without objection. Mr. Chair is there a motion to file this hearing. Motion to file that hearing. Well take that without objection. Madam clerk item 4. Resolution approving the amendment 5 for the pacific gateway for an annual lease of approximately, 1 million to accommodate terminal one Redevelopment Program. Thank you. I see wagner welcome back. Good morning chair Farrell Kathy with the San Francisco airport the the item before you seeks our approval for modification 5 to the airports compressio concessions to extend for 3 of the 4 locates the modification this modification is one of several this committee has seen recently that has come before you for approval in order to accommodate the work that the airport is doing to renovate, upgrade the terms this requires the movement of tenant and in some cases the lease terms if parts of our terminal are closed for relocate as the budget analyst said the airport modest the lease to extend the terms the airport concession staff recorded bay back if they having had known in 2009 when we originally step up to the plate the term the majority of pacific gateway premises will be in place today and through 2019 they may have chosen to have new proposals, however, as Numerous Airlines have moved from the terminal as a result of the work in terminal one and the changing construction schedule to the Redevelopment Program we believe their extension and the proposed extension of the terms before you is appropriate the proposed Lease Administration will extend the lease through september 30, 2019, and carry an estimated rent of 3. 7 million for the airport over that time there is a recommendation by he Budget Analyst Office to amend the legislation to have language retroactive to june of 2015 i believe that it is to address one at whereas clauses for the prospective date, however, they did budget Analyst Report recommends approval ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you very much supervisor tang. Just a quick question about it you could stammert for the rd why it pushes things back. It is not necessarily delayed it is moved was tbecaus of the increased passerby levels from the Redevelopment Program is it is not that anything has an delayed but timeline and shiftsd and impacted patient the terminal the gateway is one of the areas that is can changed that not necessarily delayed. Okay. Colleagues any further questions mr. Rose, can we go to your report. And. Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee on page 1 as shown in table 3 the estimated totaled relent by pacific gateway from 2016 to the end of the lease is 3 million plus and as ms. Wagner state we ask you ask for the recommended approval and recommend you approve the resolution as amended. Thank you, mr. Rose anyone wish to comment seeing none, Public Comment is closed is there a comment on the pacific gateway concession. Yes. My name is silvia johnson. That what he said been saying that i pylon for being so sick dynam im not really skewexcused but important decision there should be you know correct okay. Thank you. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues a motion to approve the d l a underlying item. Ill move 0 with a with a positive recommendation. Well take that without objection. Madam clerk item 5. Resolution approving the terms of 2011 claesz lease between airline and the city with an estimated rent of approximately 1. 3 million for the exclusive use for the contentiterms. Ms. Wagner welcome back. Kathy wagner the item before you requests your approval the new leases with Chinese Airlines with the approximately 5 years and 4 months on the Lease Agreement which will expire in 2021 the airport negotiated a new lease with the airlines at the airport this is the mechanism that allows the airlines to operate and provideds the assigned terminal rent space at the airport that is the mechanism that allows the airport to pay the city the annual Service Payment agreement a new carrier begins partitioned they have the ability to be added to the Lease Agreement that comes before you for approval in this case, the China Airlines in december of 2014 under an operating permit because a cost benefit so marked with the signatory at this point other airlines have adding got to a longer lease the estimated represent payable to the airport is approximately 11. 6 million and i ill be happy to answer any questions you may have. Thank you, ms. Wagner colleagues, any questions. Mr. Rose, can we go to your report. On item 5 were. Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee on page 18 of the report on table 2 on page 19 the rental revenues to be paid by chinese southern to the airport 11 million plus as over the 5 years and four months terms we recommend you approve this resolution. Thank you, mr. Rose no other comments Public Comment is closed. Colleagues can i have a motion to send this item forward. So moved. Well take that without objection. Madam clerk item 6. Item 6 resolution approving a Fourth Amendment to the department of health to provide hiv prevention to extend the contract for approximately 22 million. Okay. Thank you. Dpw is here to speak. Michelle Public Health this is a longstanding contract that the ada the department has with the San Francisco aids foundation weve worked since 1993 providing Critical Services in the community and subject resolution to extend the contract from july one, 2016 for two years which is still under the option granted in the current rfp authorization the recommend from the budget analyst agree with that is actually making a reduction bans under spent funding the prior years. Thank you very much colleagues, any questions mr. Rose, can we go to your report. On item 6 and. Yes. Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee on page 23 of our report in table one based on actual Budget Expenditures provided by the contract for june 30th, 2018, is 20 million plus which is 51,000 plus less than the dpw requested invited contract of 20 million plus we recommend you amend this to reduce the amount by 41 and 22 to 20 and we recommend you all the time the proposal on page to delete the inclusion of the successtoke std recommend you approve as amended. Colleagues, any further questions peculiar is there anyone else who wishes to speak on this item on item 6. Seeing none maam, Public Comment on item 6. Yeah. Good evening my name is silvia johnson. Im so fortunate i feel better and everything to be you know put as you know, we that we have succeeded more miracles on this issue and im making sure that the world does you know turn around as right thank you. Thank you very much seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues do i have a motion to send item 6 with a positive recommendation. By supervisor yee. A recommendation by the budget analyst. Im sorry accept the amendments before the undermining amending item as amended well take that without objection. Madam clerk call item 7. Item 7 resolution thor the occurrence and clarifying of multiple family bonds in a damagi aggregate amount for the purpose of financing for the acquisition of a multi Family Rental project as columbo apartment. With the Mayors Office of housing. Good morning. Im the Bond Program Manager for and im here to present a bond resolution to the fund at Columbia Park apartment this transitiaction h not changed in september fror te enundocumented for the general fund all the projects will serve families earning more than 60 percent of annual income with significant upgrade that are outlined the project and in terms of what has changed the developer has secured an allocation the developer the city has identified a Financing Team that team has developed a bond document that is before you as a timeline we anticipate closing will occur in march of 2016 and construction to begin shortly after to be completed by the end of 2017 here with me is sheila from mergi mercy housing and we like to thank you for your consideration and look forward to our continued support for the project with that, ill to do conclude the staff report and im available to answer any questions. Colleagues, any questions. Okay mr. Rose we dont have a report from item 7. This has no impact to the city mr. Chairman. Open up for Public Comment is there anyone from the public that wishes to speak on item no. 7. Good evening my name is silvia johnson. I comment at this has been you know something that has not see is not true and i will not return on this this is a different situation that has already in process with the hiv program thank you. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed colleagues, can i have a motion to approving that resolution. So moved. Motion by supervisor tang well take that without objection. Madam clerk, is there any additional business to come before this body . Theres no further business. All right. Thank you everybody were [ gavel ] good morning and welcome to the government audit and Oversight Committee for today, february 25th. Im supervisor aaron peskin, chair of the committee and to my right is supervisor norman yee and to my left is board president , supervisor london breed. The clerk is erica major and i would like to thank the folks at sfgtv for staffing this meeting. Madam clerk, do you have any announcements. Yes, please make sure to silence all Electronic Devices and cell phones, completed speaker cards and copies of any documents to be include as part of the file should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the march 8th board of supervisor
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.