Wasnt true in the first place. To suggest because it was right before the 2016 election that somehow thats a violation of federal campaign finance law. The fec and Southern District Of New York looked at the same Fact Pattern and decided it wasnt a violation of the law. This is where Alvin Bragg gets too far over his skis and legal theory where the jury will be confused and then decide this is not a violation of the law. Will Matt Whitaker thank you so much for being here this morning. Ainsley Supreme Court set to discuss if trump has the president ial immunity. He says if you are president then you are immune to a criminal trial because it would effect president s decisions. If you know when you leave office youre going to be in trouble for something that you did while you were president. Will ainsley, i really liked your message to matt. It is confusing for everyone. Its not against the law to pay someone for their silence. But the way and thats the allegation, by the way, the