now, the defense tried to assure the court that if the witness list we shared, trump wouldn't make a post about say, michael cohen or others that are involved. the judge didn't seem to buy that argument. he seemed skeptical could that potentially hinder the defense if they don't know who's coming up first to the witness thing. >> sure. i mean, because they have to cross-examine and so they want i mean, it's certainly is in the defense's interest to have all of the information gen. about what witnesses are going to be called so that they can adequately prepared. they have an idea of who it's going to be. but to know that on this particular day, which is always you just as a lawyer, you want to be as well-prepared as you possibly can be. and so they would want to have that information, but the security concerns variations, both as it pertains to witnesses in a pertains to the continued anonymous nature of the members of the jury are really important considerations in this case considering all of the attention that is given to both of them so as you were answering that question, a