you know, the era of nixon and john mitchell perhaps at the justice department, which is that there's all this stuff that happened in the justice department, including people -- including with the involvement of people who are still there. that is a profound departure from previous norms. in many cases, that is a profound and shocking violation of justice department policy. everything from, you know, intervention in criminal cases involving the president's friends to the way that reporters were apparently surveilled, and now what you're describing here. in terms of getting to the bottom of this, do you expect merrick garland to publicly testify about this, to make justice department officials who were involved in this testify? do you want congress to exercise its oversight responsibilities here, or do you want this just handled quietly by the inspector general on the i.g.'s own terms?