let's bring in our lead-off panel. jeremy bash, former chief of staff at the cia and the pentagon and three pulitzer prizewinners, carol lenning, phil rucker, both from "the washington post," and matt apuzzo from "the new york times." jeremy bash, the analysis in the national security community seems to be the men and women in the white house briefing room were speaking to u.s. policy, were speaking for america, against russia, and that the president is sort of a rogue actor. what do you make of the fact that the president, even if he's a rogue act, was the push who was alone in the room with vladimir putin? does it matter to vladimir putin, if he can get donald trump in a room alone, that his national security officials take a tougher line? >> your point is well-taken, nicolle. it was manifestly the right call and the right message for the national security leaders to stand at the white house and warn of the upcoming election. it was a rebuke of the president's position that there's nothing to worry about with respect to russian interference. in essence what you have here is part of a broad pattern where the national security establishment is in effect ignoring the commander in chief. they're basically saying,
Related Keywords
Jeremy Bash , Matt Apuzzo , The New York Times , Chief Of Staff , Cia , Panel , Pentagon , Washington Post , Phil Rucker , Three Pulitzer Prizewinners , Carol Lenning , Three , White House , Security , Briefing Room , Us , Russian , Community , Women , Policy , Analysis , Men , President , Donald Trump Jr , Point , Election , Officials , Nicolle Wallace In For Brian Tonight , Room , Fact , Vladimir Putin , Message , Line , Leaders , Rogue Actor , Push , Rogue Act , Nothing , Interference , Part , Pattern , Position , Commander In Chief , Rebuke , Establishment , Respect , Effect , Essence ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.